Skip to main content

Revisiting the turbulent prandtl number in an idealized atmospheric surface layer

Publication ,  Journal Article
Li, D; Katul, GG; Zilitinkevich, SS
Published in: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
January 1, 2015

Cospectral budgets are used to link the kinetic and potential energy distributions of turbulent eddies, as measured by their spectra, to macroscopic relations between the turbulent Prandtl number (Prt) and atmospheric stability measures such as the stability parameter ζ, the gradient Richardson number Rg, or the flux Richardson number Rf in the atmospheric surface layer. The dependence of Prt on ζ, Rg, or Rf is shown to be primarily controlled by the ratio of Kolmogorov and Kolmogorov-Obukhov-Corrsin phenomenological constants and a constant associated with isotropization of turbulent flux production that can be independently determined using rapid distortion theory in homogeneous turbulence. Changes in scaling laws of the vertical velocity and air temperature spectra are also shown to affect the Prt-ζ (or Prt-Rg or Prt-Rf) relation. Results suggest that departure of Prt from unity under neutral conditions is induced by dissimilarity between momentum and heat in terms of Rotta constants, isotropization constants, and constants in the flux transfer terms. A maximum flux Richardson number Rfm predicted from the cospectral budgets method (=0.25) is in good agreement with values in the literature, suggesting that Rfm may be tied to the collapse of Kolmogorov spectra instead of laminarization of turbulent flows under stable stratification. The linkages between microscale energy distributions of turbulent eddies and macroscopic relations that are principally determined by dimensional considerations or similarity theories suggest that when these scalewise energy distributions of eddies experience a "transition" to other distributions (e.g., when Rf is increased over Rfm), dimensional considerations or similarity theories may fail to predict bulk flow properties.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

DOI

EISSN

1520-0469

ISSN

0022-4928

Publication Date

January 1, 2015

Volume

72

Issue

6

Start / End Page

2394 / 2410

Related Subject Headings

  • Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
  • 3701 Atmospheric sciences
  • 0401 Atmospheric Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Li, D., Katul, G. G., & Zilitinkevich, S. S. (2015). Revisiting the turbulent prandtl number in an idealized atmospheric surface layer. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 72(6), 2394–2410. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0335.1
Li, D., G. G. Katul, and S. S. Zilitinkevich. “Revisiting the turbulent prandtl number in an idealized atmospheric surface layer.” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 72, no. 6 (January 1, 2015): 2394–2410. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0335.1.
Li D, Katul GG, Zilitinkevich SS. Revisiting the turbulent prandtl number in an idealized atmospheric surface layer. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 2015 Jan 1;72(6):2394–410.
Li, D., et al. “Revisiting the turbulent prandtl number in an idealized atmospheric surface layer.” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 72, no. 6, Jan. 2015, pp. 2394–410. Scopus, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-14-0335.1.
Li D, Katul GG, Zilitinkevich SS. Revisiting the turbulent prandtl number in an idealized atmospheric surface layer. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 2015 Jan 1;72(6):2394–2410.

Published In

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

DOI

EISSN

1520-0469

ISSN

0022-4928

Publication Date

January 1, 2015

Volume

72

Issue

6

Start / End Page

2394 / 2410

Related Subject Headings

  • Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
  • 3701 Atmospheric sciences
  • 0401 Atmospheric Sciences