The choice of arterial access for percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on outcome: An expert opinion perspective.
Publication
, Journal Article
Baker, NC; Ansel, GM; Rao, SV; Jolly, SS; Pichard, AD; Steinberg, D; Lipinski, MJ; Escarcega, RO; Minha, S; Lhermusier, T; Magalhães, MA; Waksman, R
Published in: Am Heart J
July 2015
The prevention of major bleeding during percutaneous coronary intervention is one of the most widely discussed and often controversial topics within interventional cardiology. The choice of arterial access should be considered a mechanism for bleeding avoidance, and various strategies have been proposed to prevent or lower major bleeding and vascular complications with varying levels of strength. Herein, we review the current literature on arterial access as a bleeding avoidance strategy during percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on outcome and provide a consensus opinion based on the strength of the evidence supporting various techniques.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Am Heart J
DOI
EISSN
1097-6744
Publication Date
July 2015
Volume
170
Issue
1
Start / End Page
13 / 22
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Vascular Closure Devices
- Treatment Outcome
- Surgery, Computer-Assisted
- Radial Artery
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Postoperative Hemorrhage
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Myocardial Infarction
- Humans
- Femoral Artery
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Baker, N. C., Ansel, G. M., Rao, S. V., Jolly, S. S., Pichard, A. D., Steinberg, D., … Waksman, R. (2015). The choice of arterial access for percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on outcome: An expert opinion perspective. Am Heart J, 170(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2015.04.023
Baker, Nevin C., Gary M. Ansel, Sunil V. Rao, Sanjit S. Jolly, Augusto D. Pichard, Daniel Steinberg, Michael J. Lipinski, et al. “The choice of arterial access for percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on outcome: An expert opinion perspective.” Am Heart J 170, no. 1 (July 2015): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2015.04.023.
Baker NC, Ansel GM, Rao SV, Jolly SS, Pichard AD, Steinberg D, et al. The choice of arterial access for percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on outcome: An expert opinion perspective. Am Heart J. 2015 Jul;170(1):13–22.
Baker, Nevin C., et al. “The choice of arterial access for percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on outcome: An expert opinion perspective.” Am Heart J, vol. 170, no. 1, July 2015, pp. 13–22. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2015.04.023.
Baker NC, Ansel GM, Rao SV, Jolly SS, Pichard AD, Steinberg D, Lipinski MJ, Escarcega RO, Minha S, Lhermusier T, Magalhães MA, Waksman R. The choice of arterial access for percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on outcome: An expert opinion perspective. Am Heart J. 2015 Jul;170(1):13–22.
Published In
Am Heart J
DOI
EISSN
1097-6744
Publication Date
July 2015
Volume
170
Issue
1
Start / End Page
13 / 22
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Vascular Closure Devices
- Treatment Outcome
- Surgery, Computer-Assisted
- Radial Artery
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Postoperative Hemorrhage
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Myocardial Infarction
- Humans
- Femoral Artery