Making the DSM-5 Concepts and Controversies
The biopolitics of defining ‘mental disorder.’
Publication
, Chapter
Kinghorn, WA
May 17, 2013
Ten years later, despite some detailed conceptual work on the DSM-5 definition which was explicitly acknowledged and credited by the DSM-5 Task Force [28], there is no evidence that the DSM-5 definition has been any more influential in the ...
Duke Scholars
ISBN
9781461465041
Publication Date
May 17, 2013
Publisher
Springer Science & Business Media
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kinghorn, W. A. (2013). The biopolitics of defining ‘mental disorder.’. In Making the DSM-5 Concepts and Controversies. Springer Science & Business Media.
Kinghorn, W. A. “The biopolitics of defining ‘mental disorder.’.” In Making the DSM-5 Concepts and Controversies. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
Kinghorn WA. The biopolitics of defining ‘mental disorder.’. In: Making the DSM-5 Concepts and Controversies. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
Kinghorn, W. A. “The biopolitics of defining ‘mental disorder.’.” Making the DSM-5 Concepts and Controversies, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
Kinghorn WA. The biopolitics of defining ‘mental disorder.’. Making the DSM-5 Concepts and Controversies. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
ISBN
9781461465041
Publication Date
May 17, 2013
Publisher
Springer Science & Business Media