Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel
Journal cover image

Expectant management versus elective curettage for the treatment of spontaneous abortion.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hurd, WW; Whitfield, RR; Randolph, JF; Kercher, ML
Published in: Fertil Steril
October 1997

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the amount of intrauterine tissue was prognostic of the risk of complications associated with the management of nonviable pregnancies diagnosed in the first trimester before cervical dilatation (termed here impending abortion) with either expectant observation or elective curettage. DESIGN: Historic cohort study. SETTING: University Infertility Service. PATIENT(S): All women with nonviable pregnancies followed by the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology during a 5-year period. The patients were divided into those with significant intrauterine tissue (gestational sac > 10 mm) and those with minimal intrauterine tissue. INTERVENTION(S): Women either underwent elective curettage or were followed expectantly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Complication rates. RESULT(S): In 89 women with minimal tissue, no complications occurred regardless of treatment mode. In 63 women with significant intrauterine tissue, expectant management resulted in more complications (9/24) than elective curettage (1/39). In the expectant group, complications included missed abortion, septic abortion, and incomplete abortion requiring emergency curettage, with one patient requiring a transfusion. In the curettage group one uterine perforation occurred. CONCLUSION(S): In women with impending abortions and minimal intrauterine tissue, expectant treatment is safe after ectopic pregnancy has been excluded. In patients with significant intrauterine tissue, the risk of complications may be decreased by elective uterine curettage compared with expectant management.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Fertil Steril

DOI

ISSN

0015-0282

Publication Date

October 1997

Volume

68

Issue

4

Start / End Page

601 / 606

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal
  • Prognosis
  • Pregnancy Trimester, First
  • Pregnancy Complications
  • Pregnancy
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Curettage
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hurd, W. W., Whitfield, R. R., Randolph, J. F., & Kercher, M. L. (1997). Expectant management versus elective curettage for the treatment of spontaneous abortion. Fertil Steril, 68(4), 601–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00314-2
Hurd, W. W., R. R. Whitfield, J. F. Randolph, and M. L. Kercher. “Expectant management versus elective curettage for the treatment of spontaneous abortion.Fertil Steril 68, no. 4 (October 1997): 601–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00314-2.
Hurd WW, Whitfield RR, Randolph JF, Kercher ML. Expectant management versus elective curettage for the treatment of spontaneous abortion. Fertil Steril. 1997 Oct;68(4):601–6.
Hurd, W. W., et al. “Expectant management versus elective curettage for the treatment of spontaneous abortion.Fertil Steril, vol. 68, no. 4, Oct. 1997, pp. 601–06. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00314-2.
Hurd WW, Whitfield RR, Randolph JF, Kercher ML. Expectant management versus elective curettage for the treatment of spontaneous abortion. Fertil Steril. 1997 Oct;68(4):601–606.
Journal cover image

Published In

Fertil Steril

DOI

ISSN

0015-0282

Publication Date

October 1997

Volume

68

Issue

4

Start / End Page

601 / 606

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal
  • Prognosis
  • Pregnancy Trimester, First
  • Pregnancy Complications
  • Pregnancy
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Curettage