Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Rapid assessment of repair of ultraviolet DNA damage with a modified host-cell reactivation assay using a luciferase reporter gene and correlation with polymorphisms of DNA repair genes in normal human lymphocytes.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Qiao, Y; Spitz, MR; Guo, Z; Hadeyati, M; Grossman, L; Kraemer, KH; Wei, Q
Published in: Mutat Res
November 30, 2002

As DNA repair plays an important role in genetic susceptibility to cancer, assessment of the DNA repair phenotype is critical for molecular epidemiological studies of cancer. In this report, we compared use of the luciferase (luc) reporter gene in a host-cell reactivation (HCR) (LUC) assay of repair of ultraviolet (UV) damage to DNA to use of the chloramphenicol (cat) gene-based HCR (CAT) assay we used previously for case-control studies. We performed both the assays on cryopreserved lymphocytes from 102 healthy non-Hispanic white subjects. There was a close correlation between DNA repair capacity (DRC) as measured by the LUC and CAT assays. Although these two assays had similar variation, the LUC assay was faster and more sensitive. We also analyzed the relationship between DRC and the subjects' previously determined genotypes for four polymorphisms of two nucleotide-excision repair (NER) genes (in intron 9 of xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) C and exons 6, 10 and 23 of XPD) and one polymorphism of a base-excision repair gene in exon 10 of X-ray complementing group 1 (XRCC1). The DRC was significantly lower in subjects homozygous for one or more polymorphisms of the two NER genes than in subjects with other genotypes (P=0.010). In contrast, the polymorphic XRCC1 allele had no significant effect on DRC. These results suggest that the post-UV LUC assay measures NER phenotype and that polymorphisms of XPC and XPD genes modulate DRC. For population studies of the DNA repair phenotype, many samples need to be evaluated, and so the LUC assay has several advantages over the CAT assay: the LUC assay was more sensitive, had less variation, was not radioactive, was easier to perform, and required fewer cryopreserved cells. These features make the LUC-based HCR assay suitable for molecular epidemiological studies.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Mutat Res

DOI

ISSN

0027-5107

Publication Date

November 30, 2002

Volume

509

Issue

1-2

Start / End Page

165 / 174

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultraviolet Rays
  • Radiation Injuries
  • Polymorphism, Genetic
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Male
  • Lymphocytes
  • Luciferases
  • Humans
  • Genotype
  • Genetic Techniques
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Qiao, Y., Spitz, M. R., Guo, Z., Hadeyati, M., Grossman, L., Kraemer, K. H., & Wei, Q. (2002). Rapid assessment of repair of ultraviolet DNA damage with a modified host-cell reactivation assay using a luciferase reporter gene and correlation with polymorphisms of DNA repair genes in normal human lymphocytes. Mutat Res, 509(1–2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00219-1
Qiao, Yawei, Margaret R. Spitz, Zhaozheng Guo, Mohammad Hadeyati, Lawrence Grossman, Kenneth H. Kraemer, and Qingyi Wei. “Rapid assessment of repair of ultraviolet DNA damage with a modified host-cell reactivation assay using a luciferase reporter gene and correlation with polymorphisms of DNA repair genes in normal human lymphocytes.Mutat Res 509, no. 1–2 (November 30, 2002): 165–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00219-1.
Journal cover image

Published In

Mutat Res

DOI

ISSN

0027-5107

Publication Date

November 30, 2002

Volume

509

Issue

1-2

Start / End Page

165 / 174

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultraviolet Rays
  • Radiation Injuries
  • Polymorphism, Genetic
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Male
  • Lymphocytes
  • Luciferases
  • Humans
  • Genotype
  • Genetic Techniques