Skip to main content

Seasonal cycles of O3 in the marine boundary layer: Observation and model simulation comparisons

Publication ,  Journal Article
Parrish, DD; Galbally, IE; Lamarque, JF; Naik, V; Horowitz, L; Shindell, DT; Oltmans, SJ; Derwent, R; Tanimoto, H; Labuschagne, C; Cupeiro, M
Published in: Journal of Geophysical Research
January 16, 2016

We present a two-step approach for quantitatively comparing modeled and measured seasonal cycles of O3: (1) fitting sine functions to monthly averaged measurements and model results (i.e., deriving a Fourier series expansion of these results) and (2) comparing the phase and amplitude of the statistically significant terms between the models and measurements. Two and only two sine terms are sufficient to quantify the O3 seasonal cycle in the marine boundary layer (MBL) in both the measurements and the model results. In addition to the expected fundamental (one sine cycle per year), a second harmonic term (i.e., two sine cycles per year) is identified as a ubiquitous feature of O3 in the MBL. Three chemistry climate models (Community Atmosphere Model with chemistry, GFDL-CM3, and GISS-E2-R) approximately reproduce many features of the measured seasonal cycles at MBL surface sites throughout the globe, with some notable quantitative disagreements, but give divergent results that do not agree with O3 sonde measurements above the MBL. This disagreement and divergence of results between models indicate that the treatment of the MBL dynamics in the chemistry-climate models is not adequate to reproduce the isolation of the MBL indicated by the observations. Within the MBL the models more accurately reproduce the second harmonic term than the fundamental term. We attribute the second harmonic term to the second harmonic of opposite phase in the photolysis rate of O3, while the fundamental term evidently has many influences. The parameters derived from the Fourier series expansion of the measurements are quantitative metrics that can serve as the basis for future model-measurement comparisons.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Geophysical Research

DOI

EISSN

2156-2202

ISSN

0148-0227

Publication Date

January 16, 2016

Volume

121

Issue

1

Start / End Page

538 / 557

Related Subject Headings

  • Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Parrish, D. D., Galbally, I. E., Lamarque, J. F., Naik, V., Horowitz, L., Shindell, D. T., … Cupeiro, M. (2016). Seasonal cycles of O3 in the marine boundary layer: Observation and model simulation comparisons. Journal of Geophysical Research, 121(1), 538–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024101
Parrish, D. D., I. E. Galbally, J. F. Lamarque, V. Naik, L. Horowitz, D. T. Shindell, S. J. Oltmans, et al. “Seasonal cycles of O3 in the marine boundary layer: Observation and model simulation comparisons.” Journal of Geophysical Research 121, no. 1 (January 16, 2016): 538–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024101.
Parrish DD, Galbally IE, Lamarque JF, Naik V, Horowitz L, Shindell DT, et al. Seasonal cycles of O3 in the marine boundary layer: Observation and model simulation comparisons. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2016 Jan 16;121(1):538–57.
Parrish, D. D., et al. “Seasonal cycles of O3 in the marine boundary layer: Observation and model simulation comparisons.” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 121, no. 1, Jan. 2016, pp. 538–57. Scopus, doi:10.1002/2015JD024101.
Parrish DD, Galbally IE, Lamarque JF, Naik V, Horowitz L, Shindell DT, Oltmans SJ, Derwent R, Tanimoto H, Labuschagne C, Cupeiro M. Seasonal cycles of O3 in the marine boundary layer: Observation and model simulation comparisons. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2016 Jan 16;121(1):538–557.

Published In

Journal of Geophysical Research

DOI

EISSN

2156-2202

ISSN

0148-0227

Publication Date

January 16, 2016

Volume

121

Issue

1

Start / End Page

538 / 557

Related Subject Headings

  • Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences