Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Heart Failure.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kelkar, AA; Spertus, J; Pang, P; Pierson, RF; Cody, RJ; Pina, IL; Hernandez, A; Butler, J
Published in: JACC Heart Fail
March 2016

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are defined as reports coming directly from patients about how they feel or function in relation to a health condition and its therapy. Although there are numerous compelling reasons why PRO could be an important help in clinical care, they have not evolved into clinical tools integrated into care. The purpose of this review is to assess existing PRO instruments for heart failure with respect to their psychometric properties and potential for use in clinical care. We performed a systematic search of articles published between July 2008 and January 2015 within the MEDLINE, PROMIS, PROQOLID, and Cochrane Library databases. Included instruments had to be developed and tested for heart failure and have had their development processes and psychometric properties described. A total of 31 instruments were identified, 9 of which met all inclusion criteria. After evaluating each remaining instrument in terms of psychometric and clinical criteria and symptom coverage, only 2 instruments-Minnesota Living with Heart Failure and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy questionnaire-met all evaluation criteria. Although clinically useful PRO instruments exist, increasing education to providers on the value and interpretability of PRO instruments, as well as a more streamlined approach to their implementation in the clinical setting is necessary. A clinical trial comparing the routine use of disease-specific PRO with clinical care could further support their incorporation into practice.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

JACC Heart Fail

DOI

EISSN

2213-1787

Publication Date

March 2016

Volume

4

Issue

3

Start / End Page

165 / 175

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Psychometrics
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Humans
  • Heart Failure
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
  • 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kelkar, A. A., Spertus, J., Pang, P., Pierson, R. F., Cody, R. J., Pina, I. L., … Butler, J. (2016). Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail, 4(3), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.015
Kelkar, Anita A., John Spertus, Peter Pang, Renee F. Pierson, Robert J. Cody, Ileana L. Pina, Adrian Hernandez, and Javed Butler. “Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Heart Failure.JACC Heart Fail 4, no. 3 (March 2016): 165–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.015.
Kelkar AA, Spertus J, Pang P, Pierson RF, Cody RJ, Pina IL, et al. Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;4(3):165–75.
Kelkar, Anita A., et al. “Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Heart Failure.JACC Heart Fail, vol. 4, no. 3, Mar. 2016, pp. 165–75. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.015.
Kelkar AA, Spertus J, Pang P, Pierson RF, Cody RJ, Pina IL, Hernandez A, Butler J. Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;4(3):165–175.
Journal cover image

Published In

JACC Heart Fail

DOI

EISSN

2213-1787

Publication Date

March 2016

Volume

4

Issue

3

Start / End Page

165 / 175

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Psychometrics
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Humans
  • Heart Failure
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
  • 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology