Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Does optimal foraging theory predict the foraging performance of a large air-breathing marine predator?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Tyson, RB; Friedlaender, AS; Nowacek, DP
Published in: Animal Behaviour
June 1, 2016

Optimal foraging theory (OFT) suggests that air-breathing diving animals should minimize costs associated with feeding under water (e.g. travel time, oxygen loss) while simultaneously maximizing benefits gained from doing so (e.g. foraging time, energy gain). Humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, foraging along the Western Antarctic Peninsula appear to forage according to OFT, but the direct costs and benefits in terms of their behaviours (e.g. allocation of time) have not been examined. We compared the foraging behaviour of humpback whales in this region inferred from multisensor high-resolution recording tags to their behaviour predicted by OFT time allocation models assuming the following currencies were being maximized: (1) the proportion of time spent foraging, (2) the net rate of energetic gain and/or (3) the ratio of energy gained to energy expended (i.e. efficiency). Model predictions for all three currencies were similar, suggesting any of these OFT models were suitable for comparison with the observed data. However, agreement between observed and optimal behaviours varied widely depending on the physiological and behavioural values used to derive optimal predictions, highlighting the need for an improved understanding of cetacean physiology. Despite this, many of the theoretical OFT predictions were supported: shallow dives (i.e. <100 m), which were short and executed most frequently, yielded the highest proportions of foraging time, and the greatest net rates of energy gain and were the most efficient. In addition, dive and foraging times increased in duration rapidly with increasing maximum dive depths to approximately 100 m and then at lower rates with deeper dives. Our findings offer a thorough examination of the applicability of time allocation OFT models to the behaviours of a large, air-breathing, diving predator and provide insights into the foraging ecology and physiology of humpback whales in the Western Antarctic Peninsula.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Animal Behaviour

DOI

ISSN

0003-3472

Publication Date

June 1, 2016

Volume

116

Start / End Page

223 / 235

Related Subject Headings

  • Behavioral Science & Comparative Psychology
  • 52 Psychology
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 30 Agricultural, veterinary and food sciences
  • 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
  • 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Tyson, R. B., Friedlaender, A. S., & Nowacek, D. P. (2016). Does optimal foraging theory predict the foraging performance of a large air-breathing marine predator? Animal Behaviour, 116, 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.03.034
Tyson, R. B., A. S. Friedlaender, and D. P. Nowacek. “Does optimal foraging theory predict the foraging performance of a large air-breathing marine predator?Animal Behaviour 116 (June 1, 2016): 223–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.03.034.
Tyson RB, Friedlaender AS, Nowacek DP. Does optimal foraging theory predict the foraging performance of a large air-breathing marine predator? Animal Behaviour. 2016 Jun 1;116:223–35.
Tyson, R. B., et al. “Does optimal foraging theory predict the foraging performance of a large air-breathing marine predator?Animal Behaviour, vol. 116, June 2016, pp. 223–35. Scopus, doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.03.034.
Tyson RB, Friedlaender AS, Nowacek DP. Does optimal foraging theory predict the foraging performance of a large air-breathing marine predator? Animal Behaviour. 2016 Jun 1;116:223–235.
Journal cover image

Published In

Animal Behaviour

DOI

ISSN

0003-3472

Publication Date

June 1, 2016

Volume

116

Start / End Page

223 / 235

Related Subject Headings

  • Behavioral Science & Comparative Psychology
  • 52 Psychology
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 30 Agricultural, veterinary and food sciences
  • 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
  • 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences