Skip to main content

A Prescriptively Selected Nonthrust Manipulation Versus a Therapist-Selected Nonthrust Manipulation for Treatment of Individuals With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Donaldson, M; Petersen, S; Cook, C; Learman, K
Published in: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
April 2016

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. BACKGROUND: Several studies that have investigated the effects of a therapist-selected versus a randomly assigned segmental approach have looked at immediate effects only for pain-related outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in outcomes following a therapist-selected nonthrust manipulation versus a prescriptively selected nonthrust manipulation in subjects with low back pain. METHODS: Subjects with mechanically producible low back pain were randomly treated with nonthrust manipulation in a therapist-selected approach or a prescriptively selected approach. All subjects received a standardized home exercise program. Outcome measures included pain, disability, global rating of change, and patient acceptable symptom state. Analyses of covariance, chi-square tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to determine differences between groups. RESULTS: Sixty-three subjects were tracked for 6 months, during which subjects in both groups significantly improved. There were no differences between groups in pain, disability, or patient acceptable symptom state scores at 6 months. There was a significant difference in global rating of change scores favoring the therapist-selected manipulation group at 6 months. CONCLUSION: This study measured long-term differences between a prescriptively selected nonthrust manipulation and a therapist-selected approach to nonthrust manipulation. In pain, disability, and patient acceptable symptom state there were no differences in outcomes, findings similar to studies of immediate effects. After 6 months, perceived well-being was significantly higher for those in the therapist-selected treatment group. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01940744). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 1b.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

DOI

EISSN

1938-1344

Publication Date

April 2016

Volume

46

Issue

4

Start / End Page

243 / 250

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Pain Measurement
  • Orthopedics
  • Manipulation, Spinal
  • Male
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • Low Back Pain
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Donaldson, M., Petersen, S., Cook, C., & Learman, K. (2016). A Prescriptively Selected Nonthrust Manipulation Versus a Therapist-Selected Nonthrust Manipulation for Treatment of Individuals With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 46(4), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2016.6318
Donaldson, Megan, Shannon Petersen, Chad Cook, and Ken Learman. “A Prescriptively Selected Nonthrust Manipulation Versus a Therapist-Selected Nonthrust Manipulation for Treatment of Individuals With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 46, no. 4 (April 2016): 243–50. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2016.6318.
Donaldson, Megan, et al. “A Prescriptively Selected Nonthrust Manipulation Versus a Therapist-Selected Nonthrust Manipulation for Treatment of Individuals With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, vol. 46, no. 4, Apr. 2016, pp. 243–50. Pubmed, doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6318.

Published In

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

DOI

EISSN

1938-1344

Publication Date

April 2016

Volume

46

Issue

4

Start / End Page

243 / 250

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Pain Measurement
  • Orthopedics
  • Manipulation, Spinal
  • Male
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • Low Back Pain
  • Humans
  • Female