Belief-propagation reconstruction for compressed sensing: Quantization vs. Gaussian approximation
Publication
, Conference
Lian, M; Pfister, HD
Published in: 2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2015
April 4, 2016
This work considers the compressed sensing (CS) of i.i.d. signals with sparse measurement matrices and belief-propagation (BP) reconstruction. In general, BP reconstruction for CS requires the passing of messages that are distributions over the real numbers. To implement this in practice, one typically uses either quantized distributions or a Gaussian approximation. In this work, we use density evolution to compare the reconstruction performance of these two methods. Since the reconstruction performance depends on the signal realization, this analysis makes use of a novel change of variables to analyze the performance for a typical signal. Simulation results are provided to support the results.
Duke Scholars
Published In
2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2015
DOI
Publication Date
April 4, 2016
Start / End Page
1106 / 1113
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lian, M., & Pfister, H. D. (2016). Belief-propagation reconstruction for compressed sensing: Quantization vs. Gaussian approximation. In 2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2015 (pp. 1106–1113). https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2015.7447132
Lian, M., and H. D. Pfister. “Belief-propagation reconstruction for compressed sensing: Quantization vs. Gaussian approximation.” In 2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2015, 1106–13, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2015.7447132.
Lian M, Pfister HD. Belief-propagation reconstruction for compressed sensing: Quantization vs. Gaussian approximation. In: 2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2015. 2016. p. 1106–13.
Lian, M., and H. D. Pfister. “Belief-propagation reconstruction for compressed sensing: Quantization vs. Gaussian approximation.” 2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2015, 2016, pp. 1106–13. Scopus, doi:10.1109/ALLERTON.2015.7447132.
Lian M, Pfister HD. Belief-propagation reconstruction for compressed sensing: Quantization vs. Gaussian approximation. 2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2015. 2016. p. 1106–1113.
Published In
2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2015
DOI
Publication Date
April 4, 2016
Start / End Page
1106 / 1113