Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Posterior ankle arthroscopy: an anatomic study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sitler, DF; Amendola, A; Bailey, CS; Thain, LMF; Spouge, A
Published in: J Bone Joint Surg Am
May 2002

BACKGROUND: Ankle arthroscopy has generally been performed with use of anterior portals with the patient in the supine position. Little has been published on ankle arthroscopy performed with use of posterior portals, particularly with the patient in the prone position. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relative safety and efficacy of ankle arthroscopy with use of posterior portals with the limb in the prone position. METHODS: Thirteen fresh-frozen cadaver specimens were used. Posterolateral and posteromedial portals were established. Arthroscopy was performed, and the extent of the talar dome that could be visualized was marked. Four-millimeter plastic cannulae were filled with oil and were placed in the portals for use as reference landmarks on magnetic resonance imaging studies. The proximity of the portal cannulae to the adjacent structures was measured on standard magnetic resonance images and then during careful dissection. The distances measured by dissection were compared with the measurements made on magnetic resonance images. RESULTS: An average of 54% (range, 42% to 73%) of the talar dome could be visualized. The average distance between a cannula and adjacent anatomic structures after dissection was 3.2 mm (range, 0 to 8.9 mm) to the sural nerve, 4.8 mm (range, 0 to 11.0 mm) to the small saphenous vein, 6.4 mm (range, 0 to 16.2 mm) to the tibial nerve, 9.6 mm (range, 2.4 to 20.1 mm) to the posterior tibial artery, 17 mm (range, 19 to 31 mm) to the medial calcaneal nerve, and 2.7 mm (range, 0 to 11.2 mm) to the flexor hallucis longus tendon. The magnetic resonance images demonstrated very similar distances except in the case of the distance between the posteromedial cannula and the tibial nerve, which often was difficult to specifically identify on magnetic resonance imaging studies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present cadaveric study suggest that, with the patient in the prone position, arthroscopic equipment may be introduced into the posterior aspect of the ankle without gross injury to the posterior neurovascular structures. Limited clinical trials should be carried out to confirm this finding.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Bone Joint Surg Am

ISSN

0021-9355

Publication Date

May 2002

Volume

84

Issue

5

Start / End Page

763 / 769

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tibial Nerve
  • Tibial Arteries
  • Tendons
  • Prone Position
  • Orthopedics
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Ligaments, Articular
  • Humans
  • Arthroscopy
  • Ankle Joint
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sitler, D. F., Amendola, A., Bailey, C. S., Thain, L. M. F., & Spouge, A. (2002). Posterior ankle arthroscopy: an anatomic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84(5), 763–769.
Sitler, David F., Annunziato Amendola, Christopher S. Bailey, Lisa M. F. Thain, and Alison Spouge. “Posterior ankle arthroscopy: an anatomic study.J Bone Joint Surg Am 84, no. 5 (May 2002): 763–69.
Sitler DF, Amendola A, Bailey CS, Thain LMF, Spouge A. Posterior ankle arthroscopy: an anatomic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 May;84(5):763–9.
Sitler, David F., et al. “Posterior ankle arthroscopy: an anatomic study.J Bone Joint Surg Am, vol. 84, no. 5, May 2002, pp. 763–69.
Sitler DF, Amendola A, Bailey CS, Thain LMF, Spouge A. Posterior ankle arthroscopy: an anatomic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 May;84(5):763–769.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Bone Joint Surg Am

ISSN

0021-9355

Publication Date

May 2002

Volume

84

Issue

5

Start / End Page

763 / 769

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tibial Nerve
  • Tibial Arteries
  • Tendons
  • Prone Position
  • Orthopedics
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Ligaments, Articular
  • Humans
  • Arthroscopy
  • Ankle Joint