Is it Worth it? Science Education of the Talented 2%
Publication
, Journal Article
Baker, LD; Canada, T
Published in: Transforming Anthropology
October 1, 2016
This essay critiques mismatch theory in science education, a theory supported by opponents of affirmative action who strive to derail efforts to diversify institutions of higher education. Can high-achieving students survive and thrive in an academic environment dominated by their super high-achieving peers? Our research suggests that while there are a variety of nuanced factors that impact an undergraduate's success in certain majors, students of all backgrounds can excel at highly selective universities, given the proper resources and support.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
Transforming Anthropology
DOI
EISSN
1548-7466
ISSN
1051-0559
Publication Date
October 1, 2016
Volume
24
Issue
2
Start / End Page
116 / 124
Related Subject Headings
- 4401 Anthropology
- 1601 Anthropology
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Baker, L. D., & Canada, T. (2016). Is it Worth it? Science Education of the Talented 2%. Transforming Anthropology, 24(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12037
Baker, L. D., and T. Canada. “Is it Worth it? Science Education of the Talented 2%.” Transforming Anthropology 24, no. 2 (October 1, 2016): 116–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12037.
Baker LD, Canada T. Is it Worth it? Science Education of the Talented 2%. Transforming Anthropology. 2016 Oct 1;24(2):116–24.
Baker, L. D., and T. Canada. “Is it Worth it? Science Education of the Talented 2%.” Transforming Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 2, Oct. 2016, pp. 116–24. Scopus, doi:10.1111/traa.12037.
Baker LD, Canada T. Is it Worth it? Science Education of the Talented 2%. Transforming Anthropology. 2016 Oct 1;24(2):116–124.
Published In
Transforming Anthropology
DOI
EISSN
1548-7466
ISSN
1051-0559
Publication Date
October 1, 2016
Volume
24
Issue
2
Start / End Page
116 / 124
Related Subject Headings
- 4401 Anthropology
- 1601 Anthropology