Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Fritz, JM; Beneciuk, JM; George, SZ
Published in: Phys Ther
May 2011

BACKGROUND: The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) was recently developed for primary care providers to use as a screening tool for subgrouping people with low back pain (LBP) on the basis of modifiable prognostic factors. The use of the SBT in physical therapy has not been described. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to describe the use of the SBT in people receiving physical therapy for LBP and to describe patterns of change in clinical outcomes across the episode of care and among SBT categories. DESIGN: This study was a prospective case series. METHODS: A total of 214 patients receiving physical therapy for LBP were administered the SBT at the initial evaluation. Treatment was at the physical therapist's discretion. Clinical outcomes included pain intensity and disability scores collected at each session. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and baseline characteristics among SBT categories were compared. Hierarchical linear mixed models were used to examine patterns of change in predicted outcomes across the episode of care. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 44.3 years (SD=15.8), and 56.5% were women. The SBT categorized 33.2% of the patients as being at low risk, 47.7% as being at medium risk, and 19.2% as being at high risk. The high-risk category corresponded to the highest initial pain intensity and disability scores. The low-risk category corresponded to the lowest initial pain intensity and disability scores. Linear mixed models indicated different patterns of change in outcome scores for pain intensity (F=3.99) and disability (F=3.49) among SBT categories. Relative to the low-risk category, the high-risk category had larger improvements in predicted outcomes and the medium-risk category had similar improvements in predicted outcomes. Limitations The SBT was not administered to 24% of eligible patients. The timing of follow-up assessments was variable. CONCLUSIONS: The SBT may provide important prognostic information for physical therapists.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Phys Ther

DOI

EISSN

1538-6724

Publication Date

May 2011

Volume

91

Issue

5

Start / End Page

722 / 732

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Utah
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Rehabilitation
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prognosis
  • Physical Therapy Modalities
  • Pain Measurement
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Fritz, J. M., Beneciuk, J. M., & George, S. Z. (2011). Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain. Phys Ther, 91(5), 722–732. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100109
Fritz, Julie M., Jason M. Beneciuk, and Steven Z. George. “Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain.Phys Ther 91, no. 5 (May 2011): 722–32. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100109.
Fritz, Julie M., et al. “Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain.Phys Ther, vol. 91, no. 5, May 2011, pp. 722–32. Pubmed, doi:10.2522/ptj.20100109.
Journal cover image

Published In

Phys Ther

DOI

EISSN

1538-6724

Publication Date

May 2011

Volume

91

Issue

5

Start / End Page

722 / 732

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Utah
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Rehabilitation
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prognosis
  • Physical Therapy Modalities
  • Pain Measurement