Skip to main content

An Assessment of Pathology Resident Access to and Use of Technology: A Nationwide Survey.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Vallangeon, BD; Hawley, JS; Sloane, R; Bean, SM
Published in: Arch Pathol Lab Med
March 2017

CONTEXT: - Current technologies including digital slide scanners and handheld devices can revolutionize clinical practice and pathology graduate medical education (GME). The extent to which these technologies are used in pathology GME is unknown. OBJECTIVES: - To determine the types of technologies used, usage amount, and how they are integrated into pathology residency/fellowship programs nationwide. DESIGN: - A 40-question online survey for residents/fellows was developed and administered via the Research Electronic Data Capture System after institutional review board approval. RESULTS: - Fifty-two program directors (37%) gave permission for participation. One-hundred seventy-one responses were received (18% response rate). Most respondents have access to personal technology (laptop = 78% [134 of 171]), smartphone = 81% [139 of 171], tablet = 49% [84 of 171]), and Web-based digital slide collections (82%, 141 of 171). Few residents are provided electronic devices by their programs (laptop = 22% [38 of 171], smartphone = 0.5% [1 of 171], and tablet = 12% [21 of 171]). Fifty-nine percent have access to digital slide scanners, 33% have access to a program-created database of digitized slides, and 52% use telepathology. Fifteen percent have access to asynchronous learning. Of those with access to video-recorded conferences, 89% review them. Program size was significantly positively correlated with resident access to program-provided laptops (P = .02) and tablets (P < .001), digital slide scanners (P = .01), and telepathology (P = .001). Of all devices, program-provided laptops are used most for professional work (60.5% use this device for more than 5 hours per day). CONCLUSIONS: - Most residents report access to multiple types of innovative technology, but incorporation of these tools within pathology training programs is highly variable. Opportunities for incorporating innovative technologies exist and could be further explored.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Arch Pathol Lab Med

DOI

EISSN

1543-2165

Publication Date

March 2017

Volume

141

Issue

3

Start / End Page

431 / 436

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Pathology
  • Internship and Residency
  • Humans
  • Education, Medical, Graduate
  • Computers
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Vallangeon, B. D., Hawley, J. S., Sloane, R., & Bean, S. M. (2017). An Assessment of Pathology Resident Access to and Use of Technology: A Nationwide Survey. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 141(3), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0228-OA
Vallangeon, Bethany D., Jeffrey S. Hawley, Richard Sloane, and Sarah M. Bean. “An Assessment of Pathology Resident Access to and Use of Technology: A Nationwide Survey.Arch Pathol Lab Med 141, no. 3 (March 2017): 431–36. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0228-OA.
Vallangeon BD, Hawley JS, Sloane R, Bean SM. An Assessment of Pathology Resident Access to and Use of Technology: A Nationwide Survey. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Mar;141(3):431–6.
Vallangeon, Bethany D., et al. “An Assessment of Pathology Resident Access to and Use of Technology: A Nationwide Survey.Arch Pathol Lab Med, vol. 141, no. 3, Mar. 2017, pp. 431–36. Pubmed, doi:10.5858/arpa.2016-0228-OA.
Vallangeon BD, Hawley JS, Sloane R, Bean SM. An Assessment of Pathology Resident Access to and Use of Technology: A Nationwide Survey. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Mar;141(3):431–436.

Published In

Arch Pathol Lab Med

DOI

EISSN

1543-2165

Publication Date

March 2017

Volume

141

Issue

3

Start / End Page

431 / 436

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Pathology
  • Internship and Residency
  • Humans
  • Education, Medical, Graduate
  • Computers
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences