Skip to main content

Strategies For Assessing Delivery System Innovations.

Publication ,  Journal Article
McGlynn, EA; McClellan, M
Published in: Health affairs (Project Hope)
March 2017

Driven by evidence of continuing gaps in health care quality and efficiency and inspired by the emergence of new value-based payment models, both large and small health care organizations are developing and deploying a wide range of care delivery innovations. But how can decision makers in these organizations determine if the innovations really improve service delivery, patient experience, clinical outcomes, or costs? Organization leaders need appropriate, timely evidence to inform their decision making. In this article we describe a range of approaches to evaluating innovations and pose key questions about the validity of the results. We highlight a specific type of evaluation approach-the stepped wedge design-because it can balance the need for internal and external validity with the ability to generate timely results. We elaborate on three key steps in the innovation assessment phase (identifying the target population, describing baseline performance, and documenting the components of the innovation) that are useful for both organizations that will generate new evidence and those using evidence generated by others. We conclude with a discussion of payer approaches for supporting health care organizations in their efforts to develop new evidence on innovations.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Health affairs (Project Hope)

DOI

EISSN

1544-5208

ISSN

0278-2715

Publication Date

March 2017

Volume

36

Issue

3

Start / End Page

408 / 416

Related Subject Headings

  • Quality of Health Care
  • Program Evaluation
  • Organizational Innovation
  • Humans
  • Health Services Needs and Demand
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
  • Decision Making
  • 4407 Policy and administration
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
McGlynn, E. A., & McClellan, M. (2017). Strategies For Assessing Delivery System Innovations. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 36(3), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1373
McGlynn, Elizabeth A., and Mark McClellan. “Strategies For Assessing Delivery System Innovations.Health Affairs (Project Hope) 36, no. 3 (March 2017): 408–16. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1373.
McGlynn EA, McClellan M. Strategies For Assessing Delivery System Innovations. Health affairs (Project Hope). 2017 Mar;36(3):408–16.
McGlynn, Elizabeth A., and Mark McClellan. “Strategies For Assessing Delivery System Innovations.Health Affairs (Project Hope), vol. 36, no. 3, Mar. 2017, pp. 408–16. Epmc, doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1373.
McGlynn EA, McClellan M. Strategies For Assessing Delivery System Innovations. Health affairs (Project Hope). 2017 Mar;36(3):408–416.

Published In

Health affairs (Project Hope)

DOI

EISSN

1544-5208

ISSN

0278-2715

Publication Date

March 2017

Volume

36

Issue

3

Start / End Page

408 / 416

Related Subject Headings

  • Quality of Health Care
  • Program Evaluation
  • Organizational Innovation
  • Humans
  • Health Services Needs and Demand
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
  • Decision Making
  • 4407 Policy and administration