Skip to main content
Journal cover image

The effect of timing of influenza vaccination and sample collection on antibody titers and responses in the aged.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kurupati, RK; Kossenkoff, A; Kannan, S; Haut, LH; Doyle, S; Yin, X; Schmader, KE; Liu, Q; Showe, L; Ertl, HCJ
Published in: Vaccine
June 27, 2017

Antibody responses, B cell subset distribution in blood and the blood transcriptome were analyzed in younger and aged human subjects before and after vaccination with the inactivated influenza vaccine. In the aged, but not the younger, individuals we saw a clear difference in antibody titers including those at baseline depending on the time of vaccination and sample collection. Differences in baseline titers in aged individuals treated in the morning or afternoon in turn affected responsiveness to the vaccine. In both younger and aged individuals, the time of sample collection also affected relative numbers of some of the B cell subsets in blood. A global gene expression analysis with whole blood samples from the aged showed small but statistically significant differences depending on the time of sample collection. Our data do not indicate that timing of vaccination affects immune responsiveness of the aged, but rather shows that in clinical influenza vaccine trials timing of collection of samples can have a major and potentially misleading influence on study outcome. In future vaccine trials, timing of vaccination and sample collection should be recorded carefully to allow for its use as a study covariant.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Vaccine

DOI

EISSN

1873-2518

Publication Date

June 27, 2017

Volume

35

Issue

30

Start / End Page

3700 / 3708

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Virology
  • Vaccines, Inactivated
  • Vaccination
  • Time Factors
  • Male
  • Influenza, Human
  • Influenza Vaccines
  • Humans
  • Gene Expression Profiling
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kurupati, R. K., Kossenkoff, A., Kannan, S., Haut, L. H., Doyle, S., Yin, X., … Ertl, H. C. J. (2017). The effect of timing of influenza vaccination and sample collection on antibody titers and responses in the aged. Vaccine, 35(30), 3700–3708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.074
Kurupati, Raj K., Andrew Kossenkoff, Senthil Kannan, Larissa H. Haut, Susan Doyle, Xiangfan Yin, Kenneth E. Schmader, Qin Liu, Louise Showe, and Hildegund C. J. Ertl. “The effect of timing of influenza vaccination and sample collection on antibody titers and responses in the aged.Vaccine 35, no. 30 (June 27, 2017): 3700–3708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.074.
Kurupati RK, Kossenkoff A, Kannan S, Haut LH, Doyle S, Yin X, et al. The effect of timing of influenza vaccination and sample collection on antibody titers and responses in the aged. Vaccine. 2017 Jun 27;35(30):3700–8.
Kurupati, Raj K., et al. “The effect of timing of influenza vaccination and sample collection on antibody titers and responses in the aged.Vaccine, vol. 35, no. 30, June 2017, pp. 3700–08. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.074.
Kurupati RK, Kossenkoff A, Kannan S, Haut LH, Doyle S, Yin X, Schmader KE, Liu Q, Showe L, Ertl HCJ. The effect of timing of influenza vaccination and sample collection on antibody titers and responses in the aged. Vaccine. 2017 Jun 27;35(30):3700–3708.
Journal cover image

Published In

Vaccine

DOI

EISSN

1873-2518

Publication Date

June 27, 2017

Volume

35

Issue

30

Start / End Page

3700 / 3708

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Virology
  • Vaccines, Inactivated
  • Vaccination
  • Time Factors
  • Male
  • Influenza, Human
  • Influenza Vaccines
  • Humans
  • Gene Expression Profiling
  • Female