Skip to main content

Evaluating Partisan Gerrymandering in Wisconsin

Publication ,  Journal Article
Herschlag, G; Ravier, R; Mattingly, JC
September 2, 2017

We examine the extent of gerrymandering for the 2010 General Assembly district map of Wisconsin. We find that there is substantial variability in the election outcome depending on what maps are used. We also found robust evidence that the district maps are highly gerrymandered and that this gerrymandering likely altered the partisan make up of the Wisconsin General Assembly in some elections. Compared to the distribution of possible redistricting plans for the General Assembly, Wisconsin's chosen plan is an outlier in that it yields results that are highly skewed to the Republicans when the statewide proportion of Democratic votes comprises more than 50-52% of the overall vote (with the precise threshold depending on the election considered). Wisconsin's plan acts to preserve the Republican majority by providing extra Republican seats even when the Democratic vote increases into the range when the balance of power would shift for the vast majority of redistricting plans.

Duke Scholars

Publication Date

September 2, 2017
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Herschlag, G., Ravier, R., & Mattingly, J. C. (2017). Evaluating Partisan Gerrymandering in Wisconsin.
Herschlag, G., R. Ravier, and J. C. Mattingly. “Evaluating Partisan Gerrymandering in Wisconsin,” September 2, 2017.
Herschlag G, Ravier R, Mattingly JC. Evaluating Partisan Gerrymandering in Wisconsin. 2017 Sep 2;
Herschlag, G., et al. Evaluating Partisan Gerrymandering in Wisconsin. Sept. 2017.
Herschlag G, Ravier R, Mattingly JC. Evaluating Partisan Gerrymandering in Wisconsin. 2017 Sep 2;

Publication Date

September 2, 2017