Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Publication ,  Journal Article
MARS Group; Allen, CR; Anderson, AF; Cooper, DE; DeBerardino, TM; Dunn, WR; Haas, AK; Huston, LJ; Lantz, BBA; Mann, B; Nwosu, SK; Spindler, KP ...
Published in: Am J Sports Med
September 2017

BACKGROUND: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been documented to have worse outcomes compared with primary ACL reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: Certain factors under the control of the surgeon at the time of revision surgery can both negatively and positively affect outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction were identified and prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Data collected included baseline demographics, intraoperative surgical technique and joint disorders, and a series of validated patient-reported outcome instruments (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] subjective form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], and Marx activity rating scale) completed before surgery. Patients were followed up for 2 years and asked to complete an identical set of outcome instruments. Regression analysis was used to control for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), activity level, baseline outcome scores, revision number, time since last ACL reconstruction, and a variety of previous and current surgical variables to assess the surgical risk factors for clinical outcomes 2 years after revision ACL reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 1205 patients (697 male [58%]) met the inclusion criteria and were successfully enrolled. The median age was 26 years, and the median time since their last ACL reconstruction was 3.4 years. Two-year follow-up was obtained on 82% (989/1205). Both previous and current surgical factors were found to be significant contributors toward poorer clinical outcomes at 2 years. Having undergone previous arthrotomy (nonarthroscopic open approach) for ACL reconstruction compared with the 1-incision technique resulted in significantly poorer outcomes for the 2-year IKDC ( P = .037; odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% CI, 1.05-5.88) and KOOS pain, sports/recreation, and quality of life (QOL) subscales ( P ≤ .05; OR range, 2.38-4.35; 95% CI, 1.03-10.00). The use of a metal interference screw for current femoral fixation resulted in significantly better outcomes for the 2-year KOOS symptoms, pain, and QOL subscales ( P ≤ .05; OR range, 1.70-1.96; 95% CI, 1.00-3.33) as well as WOMAC stiffness subscale ( P = .041; OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.02-3.03). Not performing notchplasty at revision significantly improved 2-year outcomes for the IKDC ( P = .013; OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.08-1.99), KOOS activities of daily living (ADL) and QOL subscales ( P ≤ .04; OR range, 1.40-1.41; 95% CI, 1.03-1.93), and WOMAC stiffness and ADL subscales ( P ≤ .04; OR range, 1.41-1.49; 95% CI, 1.03-2.05). Factors before revision ACL reconstruction that increased the risk of poorer clinical outcomes at 2 years included lower baseline outcome scores, a lower Marx activity score at the time of revision, a higher BMI, female sex, and a shorter time since the patient's last ACL reconstruction. Prior femoral fixation, prior femoral tunnel aperture position, and knee flexion angle at the time of revision graft fixation were not found to affect 2-year outcomes in this revision cohort. CONCLUSION: There are certain surgical variables that the physician can control at the time of revision ACL reconstruction that can modify clinical outcomes at 2 years. Whenever possible, opting for an anteromedial portal or transtibial surgical exposure, choosing a metal interference screw for femoral fixation, and not performing notchplasty are associated with significantly better 2-year clinical outcomes.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Sports Med

DOI

EISSN

1552-3365

Publication Date

September 2017

Volume

45

Issue

11

Start / End Page

2586 / 2594

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Risk Factors
  • Reoperation
  • Quality of Life
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Orthopedics
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
MARS Group, ., Allen, C. R., Anderson, A. F., Cooper, D. E., DeBerardino, T. M., Dunn, W. R., … York, J. J. (2017). Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med, 45(11), 2586–2594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517712952
MARS Group, James J., Christina R. Allen, Allen F. Anderson, Daniel E. Cooper, Thomas M. DeBerardino, Warren R. Dunn, Amanda K. Haas, et al. “Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Am J Sports Med 45, no. 11 (September 2017): 2586–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517712952.
MARS Group, Allen CR, Anderson AF, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Dunn WR, et al. Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2586–94.
MARS Group, James J., et al. “Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Am J Sports Med, vol. 45, no. 11, Sept. 2017, pp. 2586–94. Pubmed, doi:10.1177/0363546517712952.
MARS Group, Allen CR, Anderson AF, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Dunn WR, Haas AK, Huston LJ, Lantz BBA, Mann B, Nwosu SK, Spindler KP, Stuart MJ, Wright RW, Albright JP, Amendola AN, Andrish JT, Annunziata CC, Arciero RA, Bach BR, Baker CL, Bartolozzi AR, Baumgarten KM, Bechler JR, Berg JH, Bernas GA, Brockmeier SF, Brophy RH, Bush-Joseph CA, Butler JB, Campbell JD, Carey JL, Carpenter JE, Cole BJ, Cooper JM, Cox CL, Creighton RA, Dahm DL, David TS, Flanigan DC, Frederick RW, Ganley TJ, Garofoli EA, Gatt CJ, Gecha SR, Giffin JR, Hame SL, Hannafin JA, Harner CD, Harris NL, Hechtman KS, Hershman EB, Hoellrich RG, Hosea TM, Johnson DC, Johnson TS, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Kamath GV, Klootwyk TE, Levy BA, Ma CB, Maiers GP, Marx RG, Matava MJ, Mathien GM, McAllister DR, McCarty EC, McCormack RG, Miller BS, Nissen CW, O’Neill DF, Owens BD, Parker RD, Purnell ML, Ramappa AJ, Rauh MA, Rettig AC, Sekiya JK, Shea KG, Sherman OH, Slauterbeck JR, Smith MV, Spang JT, Svoboda SJ, Taft TN, Tenuta JJ, Tingstad EM, Vidal AF, Viskontas DG, White RA, Williams JS, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, York JJ. Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2586–2594.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Sports Med

DOI

EISSN

1552-3365

Publication Date

September 2017

Volume

45

Issue

11

Start / End Page

2586 / 2594

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Risk Factors
  • Reoperation
  • Quality of Life
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Orthopedics
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies