Skip to main content

Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Dickert, NW; Eyal, N; Goldkind, SF; Grady, C; Joffe, S; Lo, B; Miller, FG; Pentz, RD; Silbergleit, R; Weinfurt, KP; Wendler, D; Kim, SYH
Published in: Am J Bioeth
December 2017

Although informed consent is important in clinical research, questions persist regarding when it is necessary, what it requires, and how it should be obtained. The standard view in research ethics is that the function of informed consent is to respect individual autonomy. However, consent processes are multidimensional and serve other ethical functions as well. These functions deserve particular attention when barriers to consent exist. We argue that consent serves seven ethically important and conceptually distinct functions. The first four functions pertain principally to individual participants: (1) providing transparency; (2) allowing control and authorization; (3) promoting concordance with participants' values; and (4) protecting and promoting welfare interests. Three other functions are systemic or policy focused: (5) promoting trust; (6) satisfying regulatory requirements; and (7) promoting integrity in research. Reframing consent around these functions can guide approaches to consent that are context sensitive and that maximize achievable goals.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Bioeth

DOI

EISSN

1536-0075

Publication Date

December 2017

Volume

17

Issue

12

Start / End Page

3 / 11

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Trust
  • Personal Autonomy
  • Informed Consent
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Ethics, Research
  • Dementia
  • Biomedical Research
  • Applied Ethics
  • Acute Disease
  • 5001 Applied ethics
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Dickert, N. W., Eyal, N., Goldkind, S. F., Grady, C., Joffe, S., Lo, B., … Kim, S. Y. H. (2017). Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach. Am J Bioeth, 17(12), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1388448
Dickert, Neal W., Nir Eyal, Sara F. Goldkind, Christine Grady, Steven Joffe, Bernard Lo, Franklin G. Miller, et al. “Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach.Am J Bioeth 17, no. 12 (December 2017): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1388448.
Dickert NW, Eyal N, Goldkind SF, Grady C, Joffe S, Lo B, et al. Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach. Am J Bioeth. 2017 Dec;17(12):3–11.
Dickert, Neal W., et al. “Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach.Am J Bioeth, vol. 17, no. 12, Dec. 2017, pp. 3–11. Pubmed, doi:10.1080/15265161.2017.1388448.
Dickert NW, Eyal N, Goldkind SF, Grady C, Joffe S, Lo B, Miller FG, Pentz RD, Silbergleit R, Weinfurt KP, Wendler D, Kim SYH. Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach. Am J Bioeth. 2017 Dec;17(12):3–11.

Published In

Am J Bioeth

DOI

EISSN

1536-0075

Publication Date

December 2017

Volume

17

Issue

12

Start / End Page

3 / 11

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Trust
  • Personal Autonomy
  • Informed Consent
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Ethics, Research
  • Dementia
  • Biomedical Research
  • Applied Ethics
  • Acute Disease
  • 5001 Applied ethics