Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Quach, CW; Langer, MM; Chen, RC; Thissen, D; Usinger, DS; Emerson, MA; Reeve, BB
Published in: Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
November 2016

To evaluate the reliability and validity of six PROMIS measures (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and sleep disturbance) telephone-administered to a diverse, population-based cohort of localized prostate cancer patients.Newly diagnosed men were enrolled in the North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness and Survivorship Study. PROMIS measures were telephone-administered pre-treatment (baseline), and at 3-months and 12-months post-treatment initiation (N = 778). Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Dimensionality was examined with bifactor models and explained common variance (ECV). Ordinal logistic regression models were used to detect potential differential item functioning (DIF) for key demographic groups. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed by correlations with the legacy instruments Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer and SF-12v2. Known-groups validity was examined by age, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, and treatment.Each PROMIS measure had high Cronbach's alpha values (0.86-0.96) and was sufficiently unidimensional. Floor effects were observed for anxiety, depression, and pain interference measures; ceiling effects were observed for physical function. No DIF was detected. Convergent validity was established with moderate to strong correlations between PROMIS and legacy measures (0.41-0.77) of similar constructs. Discriminant validity was demonstrated with weak correlations between measures of dissimilar domains (-0.20--0.31). PROMIS measures detected differences across age, race/ethnicity, and comorbidity groups; no differences were found by treatment.This study provides support for the reliability and construct validity of six PROMIS measures in prostate cancer, as well as the utility of telephone administration for assessing HRQoL in low literacy and hard-to-reach populations.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation

DOI

EISSN

1573-2649

ISSN

0962-9343

Publication Date

November 2016

Volume

25

Issue

11

Start / End Page

2811 / 2823

Related Subject Headings

  • Telephone
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Psychometrics
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Male
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Humans
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Aged
  • 44 Human society
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Quach, C. W., Langer, M. M., Chen, R. C., Thissen, D., Usinger, D. S., Emerson, M. A., & Reeve, B. B. (2016). Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 25(11), 2811–2823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1325-3
Quach, Caroleen W., Michelle M. Langer, Ronald C. Chen, David Thissen, Deborah S. Usinger, Marc A. Emerson, and Bryce B. Reeve. “Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study.Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation 25, no. 11 (November 2016): 2811–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1325-3.
Quach CW, Langer MM, Chen RC, Thissen D, Usinger DS, Emerson MA, et al. Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2016 Nov;25(11):2811–23.
Quach, Caroleen W., et al. “Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study.Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, vol. 25, no. 11, Nov. 2016, pp. 2811–23. Epmc, doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1325-3.
Quach CW, Langer MM, Chen RC, Thissen D, Usinger DS, Emerson MA, Reeve BB. Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2016 Nov;25(11):2811–2823.
Journal cover image

Published In

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation

DOI

EISSN

1573-2649

ISSN

0962-9343

Publication Date

November 2016

Volume

25

Issue

11

Start / End Page

2811 / 2823

Related Subject Headings

  • Telephone
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Psychometrics
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Male
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Humans
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Aged
  • 44 Human society