Skip to main content

Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Handa, VL; Barber, MD; Young, SB; Aronson, MP; Morse, A; Cundiff, GW
Published in: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct
October 2008

Web-based questionnaires are increasingly employed for clinical research. To investigate whether web-based and paper versions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7 (PFIQ-7) yield similar results, we compared results obtained with these two modes of administration. Women with pelvic floor disorders completed both versions of these questionnaires. Scores between modes of administration were compared using the paired t test and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Among the 52 participants, there were no significant differences in scores or scale scores between the web-based and paper questionnaires. The ICC was 0.91 for the PFDI-20 score and 0.81 for the PFIQ-7 score (p < 0.001 for each). The web-based format was preferred by 22 participants (53%), ten (24%) preferred the paper format, and nine (21%) had no preference. The acceptability and score equivalence recommend these web-based questionnaires as an alternative to paper questionnaires for clinical research.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct

DOI

Publication Date

October 2008

Volume

19

Issue

10

Start / End Page

1331 / 1335

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Prolapse
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Quality of Life
  • Pelvic Floor
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Internet
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Handa, V. L., Barber, M. D., Young, S. B., Aronson, M. P., Morse, A., & Cundiff, G. W. (2008). Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 19(10), 1331–1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0651-6
Handa, Victoria L., Matthew D. Barber, Stephen B. Young, Michael P. Aronson, Abraham Morse, and Geoffrey W. Cundiff. “Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19, no. 10 (October 2008): 1331–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0651-6.
Handa VL, Barber MD, Young SB, Aronson MP, Morse A, Cundiff GW. Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Oct;19(10):1331–5.
Handa, Victoria L., et al. “Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, vol. 19, no. 10, Oct. 2008, pp. 1331–35. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s00192-008-0651-6.
Handa VL, Barber MD, Young SB, Aronson MP, Morse A, Cundiff GW. Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Oct;19(10):1331–1335.

Published In

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct

DOI

Publication Date

October 2008

Volume

19

Issue

10

Start / End Page

1331 / 1335

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Prolapse
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Quality of Life
  • Pelvic Floor
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Internet
  • Humans