Skip to main content

Physician use of parasite tests in the United States from 1997 to 2006 and in a Utah Cryptosporidium outbreak in 2007.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Polage, CR; Stoddard, GJ; Rolfs, RT; Petti, CA
Published in: J Clin Microbiol
February 2011

Parasitic infection is uncommon in the United States, but surveys suggest that physicians test when the presence of parasites is unlikely and fail to order appropriate testing when suspicion is high. Numerous studies confirm that immunoassays are more sensitive for Giardia and Cryptosporidium detection, but our experience was that physicians preferentially used ovum and parasite examination (O&P). We conducted a retrospective study of fecal parasite testing at a referral laboratory nationally (1997 to 2006) and during a Cryptosporidium outbreak (Utah, 2007) to correlate physician use of O&P and enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) with the yield of parasites detected. Nationally, of 170,671 episodes, 76.0% (n = 129,732) included O&P, 27.9% (n = 47,666) included Giardia EIA, and 5.7% (n = 9,754) included Cryptosporidium EIA. Most pathogens were Giardia or Cryptosporidium. More episodes were positive when EIA was performed (n = 1,860/54,483 [3.4%]) than when O&P only was performed (n = 1,667/116,188 [1.4%]; P < 0.001), and EIA was more sensitive than O&P. However, more O&P results were positive among patients with both O&P and EIA performed (2.5%) than among those with O&P only performed (1.4%; P < 0.001), suggesting that patients tested by O&P only may have been at lower risk. During the first 10 weeks of the outbreak, physicians also preferentially used O&P over EIA, but no Cryptosporidium cases were detected by O&P. We conclude that clinicians frequently use O&P testing when test performance and epidemiology support the use of immunoassays or no testing. We recommend that stool O&P be limited to patients with negative immunoassay results and persistent symptoms or individuals at increased risk for non-Giardia, non-Cryptosporidium infection. An evidence-based algorithm for the evaluation of patients with suspected intestinal parasitic infection is proposed.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Clin Microbiol

DOI

EISSN

1098-660X

Publication Date

February 2011

Volume

49

Issue

2

Start / End Page

591 / 596

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Parasitology
  • Parasitic Diseases
  • Parasite Egg Count
  • Microbiology
  • Immunoenzyme Techniques
  • Humans
  • Feces
  • Animals
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Polage, C. R., Stoddard, G. J., Rolfs, R. T., & Petti, C. A. (2011). Physician use of parasite tests in the United States from 1997 to 2006 and in a Utah Cryptosporidium outbreak in 2007. J Clin Microbiol, 49(2), 591–596. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01806-10
Polage, Christopher R., Gregory J. Stoddard, Robert T. Rolfs, and Cathy A. Petti. “Physician use of parasite tests in the United States from 1997 to 2006 and in a Utah Cryptosporidium outbreak in 2007.J Clin Microbiol 49, no. 2 (February 2011): 591–96. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01806-10.
Polage CR, Stoddard GJ, Rolfs RT, Petti CA. Physician use of parasite tests in the United States from 1997 to 2006 and in a Utah Cryptosporidium outbreak in 2007. J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Feb;49(2):591–6.
Polage, Christopher R., et al. “Physician use of parasite tests in the United States from 1997 to 2006 and in a Utah Cryptosporidium outbreak in 2007.J Clin Microbiol, vol. 49, no. 2, Feb. 2011, pp. 591–96. Pubmed, doi:10.1128/JCM.01806-10.
Polage CR, Stoddard GJ, Rolfs RT, Petti CA. Physician use of parasite tests in the United States from 1997 to 2006 and in a Utah Cryptosporidium outbreak in 2007. J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Feb;49(2):591–596.

Published In

J Clin Microbiol

DOI

EISSN

1098-660X

Publication Date

February 2011

Volume

49

Issue

2

Start / End Page

591 / 596

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Parasitology
  • Parasitic Diseases
  • Parasite Egg Count
  • Microbiology
  • Immunoenzyme Techniques
  • Humans
  • Feces
  • Animals