Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Predictive Factors for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement After Anterior Cervical Fusion.

Publication ,  Journal Article
De la Garza-Ramos, R; Goodwin, CR; Abu-Bonsrah, N; Jain, A; Passias, PG; Neuman, BJ; Sciubba, DM
Published in: Global Spine J
May 2018

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVES: To identify incidence and risk factors for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement after anterior cervical fusion (ACF). METHODS: Adult patients undergoing elective ACF with/without corpectomy for spondylosis from 2002 to 2011 were identified using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. The primary outcome measure was PEG tube placement; secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, total hospital charges, and discharge disposition. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of PEG tube placement. RESULTS: Of 164 097 patients, 217 (0.13%) required a PEG tube. Patients needing PEG tube placement were older (69 vs 52 years; P < .001) and more likely to be male (65% vs 46.6%; P < .001) when compared with control patients. After regression analysis, age over 65 year (odds ratio [OR] = 4.16; P < .001) was the strongest independent predictor for PEG tube placement; other associated factors included male gender (OR = 2.14; P < .001), congestive heart failure (OR = 4.11; P < .001), anemia (OR = 3.52; P < .001), alcohol abuse (OR = 2.80; P = .009), renal failure (OR = 2.25; P = .003), chronic lung disease (OR = 1.78; P < .001), corpectomy (OR = 2.16; P < .001), and fusion of ≥3 segments (OR = 1.74; P < .001). Mortality rate for patients requiring PEG tube placement was 5.1% versus 0.05% for controls (P < .001); average hospital charges were $134 379 versus $39 519 (P < .001), and nonroutine discharges were seen in 89.3% versus only 6.4% for controls (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PEG tube placement after ACF was 0.13% in this study. Identified risk factors included age >65, corpectomy, fusion of ≥3 segments, and various comorbidities. Additionally, there may be increased risk of in-hospital mortality, hospital charges, and nonroutine discharges among these patients.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Global Spine J

DOI

ISSN

2192-5682

Publication Date

May 2018

Volume

8

Issue

3

Start / End Page

260 / 265

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
De la Garza-Ramos, R., Goodwin, C. R., Abu-Bonsrah, N., Jain, A., Passias, P. G., Neuman, B. J., & Sciubba, D. M. (2018). Predictive Factors for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement After Anterior Cervical Fusion. Global Spine J, 8(3), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217713010
De la Garza-Ramos, Rafael, C Rory Goodwin, Nancy Abu-Bonsrah, Amit Jain, Peter G. Passias, Brian J. Neuman, and Daniel M. Sciubba. “Predictive Factors for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement After Anterior Cervical Fusion.Global Spine J 8, no. 3 (May 2018): 260–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217713010.
De la Garza-Ramos R, Goodwin CR, Abu-Bonsrah N, Jain A, Passias PG, Neuman BJ, et al. Predictive Factors for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement After Anterior Cervical Fusion. Global Spine J. 2018 May;8(3):260–5.
De la Garza-Ramos, Rafael, et al. “Predictive Factors for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement After Anterior Cervical Fusion.Global Spine J, vol. 8, no. 3, May 2018, pp. 260–65. Pubmed, doi:10.1177/2192568217713010.
De la Garza-Ramos R, Goodwin CR, Abu-Bonsrah N, Jain A, Passias PG, Neuman BJ, Sciubba DM. Predictive Factors for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement After Anterior Cervical Fusion. Global Spine J. 2018 May;8(3):260–265.
Journal cover image

Published In

Global Spine J

DOI

ISSN

2192-5682

Publication Date

May 2018

Volume

8

Issue

3

Start / End Page

260 / 265

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • 3202 Clinical sciences