Intent of reporting standards: Reply to Rossiter (2018).
Publication
, Journal Article
Appelbaum, M; Cooper, H; Kline, RB; Mayo-Wilson, E; Nezu, AM; Rao, SM
Published in: The American psychologist
October 2018
In this reply to Rossiter (2018), we note that the goal of developing Journal Article Reporting Standards has been to specify the kinds of information that should be provided to the readers of scientific articles in order to allow maximal understanding of the work being reported-in the case of psychometrics, information that demonstrates the underlying adequacy of the measures used in the research being reported. Although we illustrate some kinds of items that might be utilized to make these demonstrations, the illustrations are not proscriptive. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Duke Scholars
Published In
The American psychologist
DOI
EISSN
1935-990X
ISSN
0003-066X
Publication Date
October 2018
Volume
73
Issue
7
Start / End Page
932
Related Subject Headings
- Social Psychology
- Research Design
- Psychometrics
- Motivation
- 52 Psychology
- 1702 Cognitive Sciences
- 1701 Psychology
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Intent of reporting standards: Reply to Rossiter (2018). The American Psychologist, 73(7), 932. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000370
Appelbaum, Mark, Harris Cooper, Rex B. Kline, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Arthur M. Nezu, and Stephen M. Rao. “Intent of reporting standards: Reply to Rossiter (2018).” The American Psychologist 73, no. 7 (October 2018): 932. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000370.
Appelbaum M, Cooper H, Kline RB, Mayo-Wilson E, Nezu AM, Rao SM. Intent of reporting standards: Reply to Rossiter (2018). The American psychologist. 2018 Oct;73(7):932.
Appelbaum, Mark, et al. “Intent of reporting standards: Reply to Rossiter (2018).” The American Psychologist, vol. 73, no. 7, Oct. 2018, p. 932. Epmc, doi:10.1037/amp0000370.
Appelbaum M, Cooper H, Kline RB, Mayo-Wilson E, Nezu AM, Rao SM. Intent of reporting standards: Reply to Rossiter (2018). The American psychologist. 2018 Oct;73(7):932.
Published In
The American psychologist
DOI
EISSN
1935-990X
ISSN
0003-066X
Publication Date
October 2018
Volume
73
Issue
7
Start / End Page
932
Related Subject Headings
- Social Psychology
- Research Design
- Psychometrics
- Motivation
- 52 Psychology
- 1702 Cognitive Sciences
- 1701 Psychology