Skip to main content
release_alert
Welcome to the new Scholars 3.0! Read about new features and let us know what you think.
cancel
Journal cover image

Determining Resident Sleep During and After Call With Commercial Sleep Monitoring Devices.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Morhardt, DR; Luckenbaugh, A; Goldstein, C; Faerber, GJ
Published in: Urology
August 2017

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that commercial activity monitoring devices (CAMDs) are practical for monitoring resident sleep while on call. Studies that have directly monitored resident sleep are limited, likely owing to both cost and difficulty in study interpretation. The advent of wearable CAMDs that estimate sleep presents the opportunity to more readily evaluate resident sleep in physically active settings and "home call," a coverage arrangement familiar to urology programs. METHODS: Twelve urology residents were outfitted with Fitbit Flex devices during "home call" for a total of 57 (out of 64, or 89%) call or post-call night pairs. Residents were surveyed with the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS), a single-question alertness survey. Time in bed (TIB) was "time to bed" to "rise for day." Fitbit accelerometers register activity as follows: (1) not moving; (2) minimal movement or restless; or (3) above threshold for accelerometer to register steps. Total sleep time (TST) was the number of minutes in level 1 activity during TIB. Sleep efficiency (SE) was defined as TST divided by TIB. RESULTS: While on call, 10 responding (of 12 available, 83%) residents on average reported TIB as 347 minutes, TST as 165 minutes, and had an SE of 47%. Interestingly, SSS responses did not correlate with sleep parameters. Post-call sleep demonstrated increases in TIB, SE, and TST (+23%, +15%, and +44%, respectively) while sleepiness was reduced by 22%. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that urologic residents can consistently wear CAMDs while on home call. SSS did not correlate with Fitbit-estimated sleep duration. Further study with such devices may enhance sleep deprivation recognition to improve resident sleep.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Urology

DOI

EISSN

1527-9995

Publication Date

August 2017

Volume

106

Start / End Page

39 / 44

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Work Schedule Tolerance
  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Urology
  • Time Factors
  • Sleep
  • Self Report
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Polysomnography
  • Male
  • Internship and Residency
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Morhardt, D. R., Luckenbaugh, A., Goldstein, C., & Faerber, G. J. (2017). Determining Resident Sleep During and After Call With Commercial Sleep Monitoring Devices. Urology, 106, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.03.059
Morhardt, Duncan R., Amy Luckenbaugh, Cathy Goldstein, and Gary J. Faerber. “Determining Resident Sleep During and After Call With Commercial Sleep Monitoring Devices.Urology 106 (August 2017): 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.03.059.
Morhardt DR, Luckenbaugh A, Goldstein C, Faerber GJ. Determining Resident Sleep During and After Call With Commercial Sleep Monitoring Devices. Urology. 2017 Aug;106:39–44.
Morhardt, Duncan R., et al. “Determining Resident Sleep During and After Call With Commercial Sleep Monitoring Devices.Urology, vol. 106, Aug. 2017, pp. 39–44. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.urology.2017.03.059.
Morhardt DR, Luckenbaugh A, Goldstein C, Faerber GJ. Determining Resident Sleep During and After Call With Commercial Sleep Monitoring Devices. Urology. 2017 Aug;106:39–44.
Journal cover image

Published In

Urology

DOI

EISSN

1527-9995

Publication Date

August 2017

Volume

106

Start / End Page

39 / 44

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Work Schedule Tolerance
  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Urology
  • Time Factors
  • Sleep
  • Self Report
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Polysomnography
  • Male
  • Internship and Residency