Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Challenges in Aortic Stenosis: Review of Antiplatelet/Anticoagulant Therapy Management with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): TAVR with Recent PCI, TAVR in the Patient with Atrial Fibrillation, and TAVR Thrombosis Management.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sherwood, MW; Vora, AN
Published in: Curr Cardiol Rep
October 11, 2018

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to describe the current evidence and consensus recommendations around antiplatelet and anticoagulant management in three common clinical scenarios in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): (1) recent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) preceding TAVR, (2) atrial fibrillation (AF) management in patients undergoing TAVR, and (3) bioprosthetic valve thrombosis management in TAVR. RECENT FINDINGS: Several small clinical trials have evaluated the use of single vs. dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing TAVR, with most recent data favoring single antiplatelet therapy. There are several trials currently enrolling and in follow-up that evaluate the use of anticoagulants in combination with single and dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with AF undergoing TAVR, but as yet, there is no data to support a clear strategy. The use of DAPT after PCI continues to potentially shorten in patients undergoing elective PCI, thus prolonged DAPT may not be necessary post TAVR for the sake of PCI. Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis occurs more commonly than previously thought, but has uncertain clinical significance. In observational studies, antiplatelet therapy has little effect on bioprosthetic valve thrombosis, whereas anticoagulation is effective in both prevention and treatment of thrombosis. DAPT is currently recommended for 1-6 months for all patients without an indication for oral anticoagulation who undergo TAVR; however, there is a growing amount of evidence for single antiplatelet therapy. In the special situation of patients who have recently undergone PCI, the length of DAPT will depend on stent selection (BMS vs. DES), but may not be significantly prolonged unless the patient experienced an acute coronary syndrome prior to TAVR. There is no clear, optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with AF who undergo TAVR, but avoidance of triple therapy by using OAC and low-dose ASA seems to be reasonable. OAC, not DAPT, is now known to prevent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis in TAVR and SAVR patients; however, the optimal therapy remains unknown. For patients who develop bioprosthetic valve thrombosis, OAC for 3-6 months, and repeat imaging is recommended to document resolution.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Curr Cardiol Rep

DOI

EISSN

1534-3170

Publication Date

October 11, 2018

Volume

20

Issue

12

Start / End Page

130

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  • Thrombosis
  • Thrombolytic Therapy
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Humans
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • Bioprosthesis
  • Atrial Fibrillation
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Journal cover image

Published In

Curr Cardiol Rep

DOI

EISSN

1534-3170

Publication Date

October 11, 2018

Volume

20

Issue

12

Start / End Page

130

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  • Thrombosis
  • Thrombolytic Therapy
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Humans
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • Bioprosthesis
  • Atrial Fibrillation