Skip to main content
release_alert
Welcome to the new Scholars 3.0! Read about new features and let us know what you think.
cancel
Journal cover image

Impact of pronase on flow cytometric crossmatch outcome.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hetrick, SJ; Schillinger, KP; Zachary, AA; Jackson, AM
Published in: Hum Immunol
April 2011

Pronase treatment of lymphocytes is used to reduce nonspecific binding of immunoglobulins in flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) tests and at higher concentrations to remove CD20 from the cell surface. We examined the effect of pronase treatment on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) expression and on FCXM results. Lymphocytes were tested untreated and after treatment with either 2 mg/mL (10 cell donors) or 1 mg/mL (6 cell donors) of pronase. The 2 mg/mL concentration reduced HLA expression in 28 of 30 (93%) cases. The reduction was statistically significant for HLA class I antigens on T cells (33 ± 10%, p = 0.0006), class I on B cells (23 ± 13%, p = 0.012), and class II on B cells (45 ± 37%, p = 0.005). FCXMs were performed using pronase-treated and untreated cells. The 2 mg/mL concentration of pronase reduced reactivity in 5 of 16 (31%) tests of T cells and 15 of 16 (94%) tests of B cells. Of the remaining 11 T-cell tests, the reactivity was unchanged (≤ 10% difference) in 5 and increased by 18-73% in 6. Treatment with 1 mg/mL of pronase significantly increased reactivity in 20 of 23 tests of T cells (87%, p = 6.0 × 10(-5)). These data indicate that pronase treatment may result in erroneous FCXM results.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Hum Immunol

DOI

EISSN

1879-1166

Publication Date

April 2011

Volume

72

Issue

4

Start / End Page

330 / 336

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • T-Lymphocytes
  • Pronase
  • Immunosuppressive Agents
  • Immunology
  • Humans
  • Histocompatibility Testing
  • HLA Antigens
  • Gene Expression Regulation
  • Flow Cytometry
  • B-Lymphocytes
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hetrick, S. J., Schillinger, K. P., Zachary, A. A., & Jackson, A. M. (2011). Impact of pronase on flow cytometric crossmatch outcome. Hum Immunol, 72(4), 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2011.01.005
Hetrick, Sarah J., Karl P. Schillinger, Andrea A. Zachary, and Annette M. Jackson. “Impact of pronase on flow cytometric crossmatch outcome.Hum Immunol 72, no. 4 (April 2011): 330–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2011.01.005.
Hetrick SJ, Schillinger KP, Zachary AA, Jackson AM. Impact of pronase on flow cytometric crossmatch outcome. Hum Immunol. 2011 Apr;72(4):330–6.
Hetrick, Sarah J., et al. “Impact of pronase on flow cytometric crossmatch outcome.Hum Immunol, vol. 72, no. 4, Apr. 2011, pp. 330–36. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.humimm.2011.01.005.
Hetrick SJ, Schillinger KP, Zachary AA, Jackson AM. Impact of pronase on flow cytometric crossmatch outcome. Hum Immunol. 2011 Apr;72(4):330–336.
Journal cover image

Published In

Hum Immunol

DOI

EISSN

1879-1166

Publication Date

April 2011

Volume

72

Issue

4

Start / End Page

330 / 336

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • T-Lymphocytes
  • Pronase
  • Immunosuppressive Agents
  • Immunology
  • Humans
  • Histocompatibility Testing
  • HLA Antigens
  • Gene Expression Regulation
  • Flow Cytometry
  • B-Lymphocytes