Scholars@Duke publication: Predicting decompression sickness risk from H-2 dives using conventional vs. biochemical decompression in pigs.

Predicting decompression sickness risk from H-2 dives using conventional vs. biochemical decompression in pigs.

Publication , Conference

Fahlman, A; Kayar, SR; Tikuisis, P; Lin, WC; Whitman, WB

Published in: Faseb Journal

March 15, 2000

Faseb Journal

0892-6638

March 15, 2000

A612 / A612

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL

APA

Chicago

ICMJE

MLA

NLM

Fahlman, A., Kayar, S. R., Tikuisis, P., Lin, W. C., & Whitman, W. B. (2000). Predicting decompression sickness risk from H-2 dives using conventional vs. biochemical decompression in pigs. In Faseb Journal (Vol. 14, pp. A612–A612). FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL.

Fahlman, A., S. R. Kayar, P. Tikuisis, W. C. Lin, and W. B. Whitman. “Predicting decompression sickness risk from H-2 dives using conventional vs. biochemical decompression in pigs.” In Faseb Journal, 14:A612–A612. FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL, 2000.

Fahlman A, Kayar SR, Tikuisis P, Lin WC, Whitman WB. Predicting decompression sickness risk from H-2 dives using conventional vs. biochemical decompression in pigs. In: Faseb Journal. FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL; 2000. p. A612–A612.

Fahlman, A., et al. “Predicting decompression sickness risk from H-2 dives using conventional vs. biochemical decompression in pigs.” Faseb Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL, 2000, pp. A612–A612.

Fahlman A, Kayar SR, Tikuisis P, Lin WC, Whitman WB. Predicting decompression sickness risk from H-2 dives using conventional vs. biochemical decompression in pigs. Faseb Journal. FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL; 2000. p. A612–A612.

Faseb Journal

0892-6638

March 15, 2000

A612 / A612

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL