Skip to main content
The Routledge Handbook of Moral Epistemology

Relativism and pluralism in moral epistemology

Publication ,  Chapter
Wong, DB
January 1, 2018

Moral universalists hold that there is a single true or most justified morality. Moral relativists deny universalism holding instead that there can be a plurality of true or equally justified moralities insofar as two contradictory moral claims can both be correct or valid. This chapter explores the prospects for defending a modest version of moral relativism-a version opposed to the extreme view that any morality, no matter its content, is as true or justified as any other. The strategy for defending modest moral relativism is to bring to bear work in the human sciences in understanding the kind of thing a morality is and the functions it serves in the lives of those who accept it. The chapter argues that in light of these various functions, there is a variety of ways a morality can serve these functions equally well and so a plurality of true or equally justified moralities.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

DOI

Publication Date

January 1, 2018

Start / End Page

316 / 328
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Wong, D. B. (2018). Relativism and pluralism in moral epistemology. In The Routledge Handbook of Moral Epistemology (pp. 316–328). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719696-17
Wong, D. B. “Relativism and pluralism in moral epistemology.” In The Routledge Handbook of Moral Epistemology, 316–28, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719696-17.
Wong DB. Relativism and pluralism in moral epistemology. In: The Routledge Handbook of Moral Epistemology. 2018. p. 316–28.
Wong, D. B. “Relativism and pluralism in moral epistemology.” The Routledge Handbook of Moral Epistemology, 2018, pp. 316–28. Scopus, doi:10.4324/9781315719696-17.
Wong DB. Relativism and pluralism in moral epistemology. The Routledge Handbook of Moral Epistemology. 2018. p. 316–328.

DOI

Publication Date

January 1, 2018

Start / End Page

316 / 328