Skip to main content
Journal cover image

SCIENCE, RELIGION, AND ETHICS: A RESPONSE TO MICHAEL J. REISS: with Michael J. Reiss, “Science, Religion, and Ethics: The Boyle Lecture 2019”; and Janet Martin Soskice, “Science, Religion, and Ethics: A Response to Michael J. Reiss.”

Publication ,  Journal Article
Soskice, JM
Published in: Zygon
January 1, 2019

The respondent agrees with Michael Reiss's general diagnosis of the rudderless state of ethics in our modern society, but not with all of his account of its causes or possible solutions. Scripture has always been limited in terms of direct moral commands, and secular ethics has, since Aristotle at least, been influential in directing Christian understanding of the “good life.” Ethics must be based in biology, but evolutionary biology can tell us more readily what is, than guide us into “what ought” to be. Christian teaching classically emphasized moral formation, grounded in the understanding that we are creatures of a good Creator. We have our being as gift, and human life flourishes when oriented to the Good.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Zygon

DOI

EISSN

1467-9744

ISSN

0591-2385

Publication Date

January 1, 2019

Volume

54

Issue

3

Start / End Page

808 / 812

Related Subject Headings

  • Science Studies
  • 5004 Religious studies
  • 5003 Philosophy
  • 2204 Religion and Religious Studies
  • 2203 Philosophy
  • 1608 Sociology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Journal cover image

Published In

Zygon

DOI

EISSN

1467-9744

ISSN

0591-2385

Publication Date

January 1, 2019

Volume

54

Issue

3

Start / End Page

808 / 812

Related Subject Headings

  • Science Studies
  • 5004 Religious studies
  • 5003 Philosophy
  • 2204 Religion and Religious Studies
  • 2203 Philosophy
  • 1608 Sociology