Skip to main content

Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Latif, F; Uyeda, L; Edson, R; Bhatt, DL; Goldman, S; Holmes, DR; Rao, SV; Shunk, K; Aggarwal, K; Uretsky, B; Bolad, I; Ziada, K; McFalls, E ...
Published in: Circ Cardiovasc Interv
February 2020

BACKGROUND: Direct stenting without pre-dilation or post-dilation has been advocated for saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention to decrease the incidence of distal embolization, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in the DIVA (Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty; NCT01121224) prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients were stratified into stent-only and balloon-stent groups. Primary end point was 12-month incidence of target vessel failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Secondary end points included all-cause death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization during follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 575 patients included in this substudy, 185 (32%) patients underwent stent-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients in the stent-only versus balloon-stent group had similar baseline characteristics and similar incidence of target vessel failure at 12-months (15% versus 19%; hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.86-2.08]; P=0.19). During long-term follow-up (median of 2.7 years), the incidence of definite stent thrombosis (1% versus 5%; hazard ratio, 9.20 [95% CI, 1.23-68.92]; P=0.0085), the composite of definite or probable stent thrombosis (5% versus 11%; hazard ratio, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.23-5.18]; P=0.009), and target vessel myocardial infarction (8% versus 14%; hazard ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.08-3.40]; P=0.023) was lower in the stent-only group. Multivariable analysis showed that a higher number of years since coronary artery bypass grafting and >1 target saphenous vein graft lesions were associated with increased target vessel failure during entire follow-up, while preintervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-3 flow was protective. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo saphenous vein graft lesions, there was no difference in target vessel failure at 12 months and long-term follow-up in the stent-only versus the balloon-stent group; however, the incidence of stent thrombosis was lower in the stent-only group, as was target vessel myocardial infarction. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01121224.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Interv

DOI

EISSN

1941-7632

Publication Date

February 2020

Volume

13

Issue

2

Start / End Page

e008494

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vascular Patency
  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Stents
  • Saphenous Vein
  • Risk Factors
  • Prospective Studies
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Middle Aged
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Latif, F., Uyeda, L., Edson, R., Bhatt, D. L., Goldman, S., Holmes, D. R., … Brilakis, E. S. (2020). Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 13(2), e008494. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494
Latif, Faisal, Lauren Uyeda, Robert Edson, Deepak L. Bhatt, Steven Goldman, David R. Holmes, Sunil V. Rao, et al. “Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial.Circ Cardiovasc Interv 13, no. 2 (February 2020): e008494. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494.
Latif F, Uyeda L, Edson R, Bhatt DL, Goldman S, Holmes DR, et al. Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;13(2):e008494.
Latif, Faisal, et al. “Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial.Circ Cardiovasc Interv, vol. 13, no. 2, Feb. 2020, p. e008494. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494.
Latif F, Uyeda L, Edson R, Bhatt DL, Goldman S, Holmes DR, Rao SV, Shunk K, Aggarwal K, Uretsky B, Bolad I, Ziada K, McFalls E, Irimpen A, Truong HT, Kinlay S, Papademetriou V, Velagaleti RS, Rangan BV, Mavromatis K, Shih M-C, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;13(2):e008494.

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Interv

DOI

EISSN

1941-7632

Publication Date

February 2020

Volume

13

Issue

2

Start / End Page

e008494

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vascular Patency
  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Stents
  • Saphenous Vein
  • Risk Factors
  • Prospective Studies
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Middle Aged