Skip to main content

Comparison of Annotation Services for Next-Generation Sequencing in a Large-Scale Precision Oncology Program.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Katsoulakis, E; Duffy, JE; Hintze, B; Spector, NL; Kelley, MJ
Published in: JCO Precis Oncol
2020

PURPOSE: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) multigene panel testing has become widespread, including the Veterans Affairs (VA), through the VA National Precision Oncology Program (NPOP). The interpretation of genomic alterations remains a bottleneck for realizing precision medicine. We sought to examine the concordance for pathogenicity determination and clinical actionability of annotation services in NPOP. METHODS: Unique gene variants were generated from NGS gene panel results using two sequencing services. For each unique gene variant, annotations were provided through N-of-One (NoO), IBM Watson for Genomics (WfG), and OncoKB. Annotations for pathogenicity (all three sources) and actionability (WfG and OncoKB) were examined for concordance. Cohen's kappa statistic was calculated to measure agreement between annotation services. RESULTS: Among 1,227 NGS results obtained between 2015 and 2017, 1,388 unique variants were identified in 117 genes. The genes with the largest number of variants included TP53 (270), STK11 (92), and CDKN2A (81). The most common cancer type was lung adenocarcinoma (440), followed by colon adenocarcinoma (113). For pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants, there was 30% agreement between WfG and NoO (kappa, -0.26), 76% agreement between WfG and OncoKB (kappa, 0.22), and 42% agreement between NoO and OncoKB (kappa, -0.07). For level 1 drug actionability of gene variant-diagnosis combinations, there was moderate agreement between WfG and OncoKB (96.9%; kappa, 0.44), with 27 combinations identified as level 1 by both services, 58 by WfG alone, and 6 variants by OncoKB alone. CONCLUSION: There is substantial variability in pathogenicity assessment of NGS variants in solid tumors by annotation services. In addition, there was only moderate agreement in level 1 therapeutic actionability recommendations between WfG and OncoKB. Improvement in the precision of NGS multigene panel annotation is needed.

Duke Scholars

Published In

JCO Precis Oncol

DOI

EISSN

2473-4284

Publication Date

2020

Volume

4

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Katsoulakis, E., Duffy, J. E., Hintze, B., Spector, N. L., & Kelley, M. J. (2020). Comparison of Annotation Services for Next-Generation Sequencing in a Large-Scale Precision Oncology Program. JCO Precis Oncol, 4. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.19.00118
Katsoulakis, Evangelia, Jill E. Duffy, Bradley Hintze, Neil L. Spector, and Michael J. Kelley. “Comparison of Annotation Services for Next-Generation Sequencing in a Large-Scale Precision Oncology Program.JCO Precis Oncol 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.19.00118.
Katsoulakis E, Duffy JE, Hintze B, Spector NL, Kelley MJ. Comparison of Annotation Services for Next-Generation Sequencing in a Large-Scale Precision Oncology Program. JCO Precis Oncol. 2020;4.
Katsoulakis, Evangelia, et al. “Comparison of Annotation Services for Next-Generation Sequencing in a Large-Scale Precision Oncology Program.JCO Precis Oncol, vol. 4, 2020. Pubmed, doi:10.1200/PO.19.00118.
Katsoulakis E, Duffy JE, Hintze B, Spector NL, Kelley MJ. Comparison of Annotation Services for Next-Generation Sequencing in a Large-Scale Precision Oncology Program. JCO Precis Oncol. 2020;4.

Published In

JCO Precis Oncol

DOI

EISSN

2473-4284

Publication Date

2020

Volume

4

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis