Skip to main content

Recovering the Metabolic, Self-Thinning, and Constant Final Yield Rules in Mono-Specific Stands

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mrad, A; Manzoni, S; Oren, R; Vico, G; Lindh, M; Katul, G
Published in: Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
May 27, 2020

Competition among plants of the same species often results in power-law relations between measures of crowding, such as plant density, and average size, such as individual biomass. Yoda's self-thinning rule, the constant final yield rule, and metabolic scaling, all link individual plant biomass to plant density and are widely applied in crop, forest, and ecosystem management. These dictate how plant biomass increases with decreasing plant density following a given power-law exponent and a constant of proportionality. While the exponent has been proposed to be universal and thus independent of species, age, environmental, and edaphic conditions, different theoretical mechanisms yield absolute values ranging from less than 1 to nearly 2. Here, eight hypothetical mechanisms linking the exponent to constraints imposed on plant competition are featured and contrasted. Using dimensional considerations applied to plants growing isometrically, the predicted exponent is −3/2 (Yoda's rule). Other theories based on metabolic arguments and network transport predict an exponent of −4/3. These rules, which describe stand dynamics over time, differ from the “rule of constant final yield” that predicts an exponent of −1 between the initial planting density and the final yield attained across stands. The latter can be recovered from statistical arguments applied at the time scale in which the site carrying capacity is approached. Numerical models of plant competition produce plant biomass-density scaling relations with an exponent between −0.9 and −1.8 depending on the mechanism and strength of plant-plant interaction. These different mechanisms are framed here as a generic dynamical system describing the scaled-up carbon economy of all plants in an ecosystem subject to differing constraints. The implications of these mechanisms for forest management under a changing climate are discussed and recent research on the effects of changing aridity and site “quality” on self-thinning are highlighted.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Frontiers in Forests and Global Change

DOI

EISSN

2624-893X

Publication Date

May 27, 2020

Volume

3

Related Subject Headings

  • 3007 Forestry sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mrad, A., Manzoni, S., Oren, R., Vico, G., Lindh, M., & Katul, G. (2020). Recovering the Metabolic, Self-Thinning, and Constant Final Yield Rules in Mono-Specific Stands. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00062
Mrad, A., S. Manzoni, R. Oren, G. Vico, M. Lindh, and G. Katul. “Recovering the Metabolic, Self-Thinning, and Constant Final Yield Rules in Mono-Specific Stands.” Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 3 (May 27, 2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00062.
Mrad A, Manzoni S, Oren R, Vico G, Lindh M, Katul G. Recovering the Metabolic, Self-Thinning, and Constant Final Yield Rules in Mono-Specific Stands. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 2020 May 27;3.
Mrad, A., et al. “Recovering the Metabolic, Self-Thinning, and Constant Final Yield Rules in Mono-Specific Stands.” Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, vol. 3, May 2020. Scopus, doi:10.3389/ffgc.2020.00062.
Mrad A, Manzoni S, Oren R, Vico G, Lindh M, Katul G. Recovering the Metabolic, Self-Thinning, and Constant Final Yield Rules in Mono-Specific Stands. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 2020 May 27;3.

Published In

Frontiers in Forests and Global Change

DOI

EISSN

2624-893X

Publication Date

May 27, 2020

Volume

3

Related Subject Headings

  • 3007 Forestry sciences