Skip to main content
release_alert
Welcome to the new Scholars 3.0! Read about new features and let us know what you think.
cancel

Informing Healthcare Decisions with Observational Research Assessing Causal Effect. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gershon, AS; Lindenauer, PK; Wilson, KC; Rose, L; Walkey, AJ; Sadatsafavi, M; Anstrom, KJ; Au, DH; Bender, BG; Brookhart, MA; Dweik, RA ...
Published in: Am J Respir Crit Care Med
January 1, 2021

Rationale: Decisions in medicine are made on the basis of knowledge and reasoning, often in shared conversations with patients and families in consideration of clinical practice guideline recommendations, individual preferences, and individual goals. Observational studies can provide valuable knowledge to inform guidelines, decisions, and policy.Objectives: The American Thoracic Society (ATS) created a multidisciplinary ad hoc committee to develop a research statement to clarify the role of observational studies-alongside randomized controlled trials (RCTs)-in informing clinical decisions in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine.Methods: The committee examined the strengths of observational studies assessing causal effects, how they complement RCTs, factors that impact observational study quality, perceptions of observational research, and, finally, the practicalities of incorporating observational research into ATS clinical practice guidelines.Measurements and Main Results: There are strengths and weakness of observational studies as well as RCTs. Observational studies can provide evidence in representative and diverse patient populations. Quality observational studies should be sought in the development of ATS clinical practice guidelines, and medical decision-making in general, when 1) no RCTs are identified or RCTs are appraised as being of low- or very low-quality (replacement); 2) RCTs are of moderate quality because of indirectness, imprecision, or inconsistency, and observational studies mitigate the reason that RCT evidence was downgraded (complementary); or 3) RCTs do not provide evidence for outcomes that a guideline committee considers essential for decision-making (e.g., rare or long-term outcomes; "sequential").Conclusions: Observational studies should be considered in developing clinical practice guidelines and in making clinical decisions.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Respir Crit Care Med

DOI

EISSN

1535-4970

Publication Date

January 1, 2021

Volume

203

Issue

1

Start / End Page

14 / 23

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Thoracic Diseases
  • Societies, Medical
  • Respiratory System
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Observational Studies as Topic
  • Humans
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Critical Care
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gershon, A. S., Lindenauer, P. K., Wilson, K. C., Rose, L., Walkey, A. J., Sadatsafavi, M., … Krishnan, J. A. (2021). Informing Healthcare Decisions with Observational Research Assessing Causal Effect. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 203(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202010-3943ST
Gershon, Andrea S., Peter K. Lindenauer, Kevin C. Wilson, Louise Rose, Allan J. Walkey, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Kevin J. Anstrom, et al. “Informing Healthcare Decisions with Observational Research Assessing Causal Effect. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.Am J Respir Crit Care Med 203, no. 1 (January 1, 2021): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202010-3943ST.
Gershon AS, Lindenauer PK, Wilson KC, Rose L, Walkey AJ, Sadatsafavi M, et al. Informing Healthcare Decisions with Observational Research Assessing Causal Effect. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 1;203(1):14–23.
Gershon, Andrea S., et al. “Informing Healthcare Decisions with Observational Research Assessing Causal Effect. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.Am J Respir Crit Care Med, vol. 203, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 14–23. Pubmed, doi:10.1164/rccm.202010-3943ST.
Gershon AS, Lindenauer PK, Wilson KC, Rose L, Walkey AJ, Sadatsafavi M, Anstrom KJ, Au DH, Bender BG, Brookhart MA, Dweik RA, Han MK, Joo MJ, Lavergne V, Mehta AB, Miravitlles M, Mularski RA, Roche N, Oren E, Riekert KA, Schoenberg NC, Stukel TA, Weiss CH, Wunsch H, Africk JJ, Krishnan JA. Informing Healthcare Decisions with Observational Research Assessing Causal Effect. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 1;203(1):14–23.

Published In

Am J Respir Crit Care Med

DOI

EISSN

1535-4970

Publication Date

January 1, 2021

Volume

203

Issue

1

Start / End Page

14 / 23

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Thoracic Diseases
  • Societies, Medical
  • Respiratory System
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Observational Studies as Topic
  • Humans
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Critical Care