Skip to main content

Counter incision is a safe and effective method for alternative reservoir placement during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Grimberg, D; Wang, S; Carlos, E; Nosé, B; Harper, S; Lentz, AC
Published in: Transl Androl Urol
December 2020

BACKGROUND: Alternative reservoir placement is increasingly popular during inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery to prevent intraperitoneal positioning, bowel, bladder, or vascular injury in patients with prior pelvic surgeries. Counter incision (CI) can be used for submuscular reservoir placement in high risk patients, however series exploring the safety remain limited. METHODS: A database of IPP surgeries was queried for use of a CI during reservoir placement to compare 90-day clinical outcomes in a retrospective case-control study. Primary outcome was device infections, with secondary outcomes including reservoir herniation, hematoma, device malfunction rates, and operative times. Groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-Squared tests, with multivariate logistic regression models to identify predictors of infectious complications. RESULTS: A total of 534 cases met criteria, of which 51 (9.6%) used a CI for reservoir placement. The CI cohort included significantly more removal and replacements, 45.1% vs. 20.9% (P<0.001). Thirty-one CI patients (61.0%) had undergone prior prostatectomy compared to 134 (27.7%) non-CI patients (P=0.001). The most common reasons for CI were prior prostatectomy and inguinal hernia repair. Median operative time was 17 minutes longer in the CI group (74 vs. 57 minutes, P<0.001). Device infection rates were similar (2.0% vs. 4.1%, P=0.71), as were rates of hematoma (5.9% vs. 2.7%, P=0.19), and device malfunction (0.0% vs. 1.4% P=1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates were similar between CI and non-CI cohorts, even in a subset where approximately half the cases were removal and replacements. For physicians not comfortable with alternative placement through a penoscrotal or infrapubic incision, this offers a reasonable alternative and permits use of three-piece devices in patients with a hostile pelvis.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Transl Androl Urol

DOI

ISSN

2223-4691

Publication Date

December 2020

Volume

9

Issue

6

Start / End Page

2688 / 2696

Location

China

Related Subject Headings

  • 3215 Reproductive medicine
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Grimberg, D., Wang, S., Carlos, E., Nosé, B., Harper, S., & Lentz, A. C. (2020). Counter incision is a safe and effective method for alternative reservoir placement during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Transl Androl Urol, 9(6), 2688–2696. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-923
Grimberg, Dominic, Sabrina Wang, Evan Carlos, Brent Nosé, Shelby Harper, and Aaron C. Lentz. “Counter incision is a safe and effective method for alternative reservoir placement during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.Transl Androl Urol 9, no. 6 (December 2020): 2688–96. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-923.
Grimberg D, Wang S, Carlos E, Nosé B, Harper S, Lentz AC. Counter incision is a safe and effective method for alternative reservoir placement during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec;9(6):2688–96.
Grimberg, Dominic, et al. “Counter incision is a safe and effective method for alternative reservoir placement during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.Transl Androl Urol, vol. 9, no. 6, Dec. 2020, pp. 2688–96. Pubmed, doi:10.21037/tau-20-923.
Grimberg D, Wang S, Carlos E, Nosé B, Harper S, Lentz AC. Counter incision is a safe and effective method for alternative reservoir placement during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec;9(6):2688–2696.

Published In

Transl Androl Urol

DOI

ISSN

2223-4691

Publication Date

December 2020

Volume

9

Issue

6

Start / End Page

2688 / 2696

Location

China

Related Subject Headings

  • 3215 Reproductive medicine
  • 3202 Clinical sciences