Skip to main content

Lay Health Worker-Led Cancer Symptom Screening Intervention and the Effect on Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Health Status, Health Care Use, and Total Costs: Results From a Tri-Part Collaboration.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Patel, MI; Ramirez, D; Agajanian, R; Agajanian, H; Bhattacharya, J; Bundorf, KM
Published in: JCO oncology practice
January 2020

Poor patient experiences and increasing costs from undertreated symptoms require approaches that improve patient-reported outcomes and lower expenditures. We developed and evaluated the effect of a lay health worker (LHW)-led symptom screening intervention on satisfaction, self-reported overall and mental health, health care use, total costs, and survival.From November 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016, we enrolled in this study all newly diagnosed Medicare Advantage enrollees with stage 3 or 4 solid tumors or hematologic malignancies who were receiving care in a community oncology practice. We evaluated symptom changes from baseline to 12 months for the intervention group. We compared with a control group (a historical cohort of Medicare Advantage enrollees diagnosed with cancer from November 1, 2014, to October 31, 2015) changes in satisfaction and overall and mental health with validated assessments at diagnosis and 5 months postdiagnosis, 12-month health care use, total costs, and survival.Among 186 patients in the intervention group and 102 in the control group, most were female and non-Hispanic white or Hispanic, and the mean age was 79 years. There were no survival differences between the groups. Relative to the control group, the intervention group experienced improvements in satisfaction with care (difference-in-difference: 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.63), overall health (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.49 to 3.32), and mental or emotional health (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.46 to 3.38) over time; fewer hospitalizations (mean ± standard deviation: 0.72 ± 0.96 v 1.02 ± 1.44; P = .03) and emergency department visits per 1,000 members per year (0.61 ± 0.98 v 0.92 ± 1.53; P = .03), and lower median (interquartile range) total health care costs ($21,266 [$8,102-$47,900] v $31,946 [$15,754-$57,369]; P = .02).An LHW-led symptom screening intervention could be one solution to improve value-based cancer care.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

JCO oncology practice

DOI

EISSN

2688-1535

ISSN

2688-1527

Publication Date

January 2020

Volume

16

Issue

1

Start / End Page

e19 / e28

Related Subject Headings

  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Neoplasms
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Status
  • Health Personnel
  • Female
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Patel, M. I., Ramirez, D., Agajanian, R., Agajanian, H., Bhattacharya, J., & Bundorf, K. M. (2020). Lay Health Worker-Led Cancer Symptom Screening Intervention and the Effect on Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Health Status, Health Care Use, and Total Costs: Results From a Tri-Part Collaboration. JCO Oncology Practice, 16(1), e19–e28. https://doi.org/10.1200/jop.19.00152
Patel, Manali I., David Ramirez, Richy Agajanian, Hilda Agajanian, Jay Bhattacharya, and Kate M. Bundorf. “Lay Health Worker-Led Cancer Symptom Screening Intervention and the Effect on Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Health Status, Health Care Use, and Total Costs: Results From a Tri-Part Collaboration.JCO Oncology Practice 16, no. 1 (January 2020): e19–28. https://doi.org/10.1200/jop.19.00152.

Published In

JCO oncology practice

DOI

EISSN

2688-1535

ISSN

2688-1527

Publication Date

January 2020

Volume

16

Issue

1

Start / End Page

e19 / e28

Related Subject Headings

  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Neoplasms
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Status
  • Health Personnel
  • Female
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis