Skip to main content
Journal cover image

State variation in effects of state social distancing policies on COVID-19 cases.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kaufman, BG; Whitaker, R; Mahendraratnam, N; Hurewitz, S; Yi, J; Smith, VA; McClellan, M
Published in: BMC Public Health
June 28, 2021

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) sickened over 20 million residents in the United States (US) by January 2021. Our objective was to describe state variation in the effect of initial social distancing policies and non-essential business (NEB) closure on infection rates early in 2020. METHODS: We used an interrupted time series study design to estimate the total effect of all state social distancing orders, including NEB closure, shelter-in-place, and stay-at-home orders, on cumulative COVID-19 cases for each state. Data included the daily number of COVID-19 cases and deaths for all 50 states and Washington, DC from the New York Times database (January 21 to May 7, 2020). We predicted cumulative daily cases and deaths using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution and a log link for two models. RESULTS: Social distancing was associated with a 15.4% daily reduction (Relative Risk = 0.846; Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.832, 0.859) in COVID-19 cases. After 3 weeks, social distancing prevented nearly 33 million cases nationwide, with about half (16.5 million) of those prevented cases among residents of the Mid-Atlantic census division (New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania). Eleven states prevented more than 10,000 cases per 100,000 residents within 3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of social distancing on the infection rate of COVID-19 in the US varied substantially across states, and effects were largest in states with highest community spread.

Duke Scholars

Published In

BMC Public Health

DOI

EISSN

1471-2458

Publication Date

June 28, 2021

Volume

21

Issue

1

Start / End Page

1239

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Public Health
  • Policy
  • Physical Distancing
  • Pennsylvania
  • New York
  • New Jersey
  • Humans
  • COVID-19
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kaufman, B. G., Whitaker, R., Mahendraratnam, N., Hurewitz, S., Yi, J., Smith, V. A., & McClellan, M. (2021). State variation in effects of state social distancing policies on COVID-19 cases. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1239. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11236-3
Kaufman, Brystana G., Rebecca Whitaker, Nirosha Mahendraratnam, Sophie Hurewitz, Jeremy Yi, Valerie A. Smith, and Mark McClellan. “State variation in effects of state social distancing policies on COVID-19 cases.BMC Public Health 21, no. 1 (June 28, 2021): 1239. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11236-3.
Kaufman BG, Whitaker R, Mahendraratnam N, Hurewitz S, Yi J, Smith VA, et al. State variation in effects of state social distancing policies on COVID-19 cases. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):1239.
Kaufman, Brystana G., et al. “State variation in effects of state social distancing policies on COVID-19 cases.BMC Public Health, vol. 21, no. 1, June 2021, p. 1239. Pubmed, doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11236-3.
Kaufman BG, Whitaker R, Mahendraratnam N, Hurewitz S, Yi J, Smith VA, McClellan M. State variation in effects of state social distancing policies on COVID-19 cases. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):1239.
Journal cover image

Published In

BMC Public Health

DOI

EISSN

1471-2458

Publication Date

June 28, 2021

Volume

21

Issue

1

Start / End Page

1239

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Public Health
  • Policy
  • Physical Distancing
  • Pennsylvania
  • New York
  • New Jersey
  • Humans
  • COVID-19