Skip to main content

Diagnostic Accuracy of Follow-Up FDG PET or PET/CT in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer After Definitive Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sheikhbahaei, S; Taghipour, M; Ahmad, R; Fakhry, C; Kiess, AP; Chung, CH; Subramaniam, RM
Published in: AJR Am J Roentgenol
September 2015

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of local, regional, and distant recurrences in the follow-up of patients with head and neck cancer who underwent definitive treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE and Cochrane Library (updated September 2014) to identify relevant published studies. Studies investigating the accuracy of FDG PET/CT that were performed at least 4 months after therapy were included. Two authors independently screened all retrieved articles, selected studies that met the inclusion criteria, and extracted the data. Histopathologic confirmation or clinical follow-up of at least 6 month (or both) was considered as the reference standard. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies constituting a total of 2247 FDG PET/CT examinations met our inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of follow-up PET/CT for detection of recurrence were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94), and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of scans performed 4-12 months after treatment were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.70-0.84), respectively. Similar estimates for scans performed at or more than 12 months after treatment were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.78-0.96), respectively. The overall accuracy of FDG PET/CT in detecting recurrence is higher in patients without suspicion of recurrence before the scan compared with the patients with suspected recurrence. CONCLUSION: The high diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT in detecting recurrence in curatively treated patients with head and neck cancer supports its use in clinical practice for patient follow-up. Further studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic utility of PET/CT in the follow-up of head and neck cancer.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

AJR Am J Roentgenol

DOI

EISSN

1546-3141

Publication Date

September 2015

Volume

205

Issue

3

Start / End Page

629 / 639

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Multimodal Imaging
  • Humans
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sheikhbahaei, S., Taghipour, M., Ahmad, R., Fakhry, C., Kiess, A. P., Chung, C. H., & Subramaniam, R. M. (2015). Diagnostic Accuracy of Follow-Up FDG PET or PET/CT in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer After Definitive Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 205(3), 629–639. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.14166
Sheikhbahaei, Sara, Mehdi Taghipour, Rubina Ahmad, Carole Fakhry, Ana P. Kiess, Christine H. Chung, and Rathan M. Subramaniam. “Diagnostic Accuracy of Follow-Up FDG PET or PET/CT in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer After Definitive Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.AJR Am J Roentgenol 205, no. 3 (September 2015): 629–39. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.14166.
Sheikhbahaei S, Taghipour M, Ahmad R, Fakhry C, Kiess AP, Chung CH, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Follow-Up FDG PET or PET/CT in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer After Definitive Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Sep;205(3):629–39.
Sheikhbahaei, Sara, et al. “Diagnostic Accuracy of Follow-Up FDG PET or PET/CT in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer After Definitive Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol. 205, no. 3, Sept. 2015, pp. 629–39. Pubmed, doi:10.2214/AJR.14.14166.
Sheikhbahaei S, Taghipour M, Ahmad R, Fakhry C, Kiess AP, Chung CH, Subramaniam RM. Diagnostic Accuracy of Follow-Up FDG PET or PET/CT in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer After Definitive Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Sep;205(3):629–639.

Published In

AJR Am J Roentgenol

DOI

EISSN

1546-3141

Publication Date

September 2015

Volume

205

Issue

3

Start / End Page

629 / 639

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Multimodal Imaging
  • Humans
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • 3202 Clinical sciences