Skip to main content

Revisiting Secondary Information Related to Pharmacogenetic Testing.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Haga, SB
Published in: Front Genet
2021

Incidental or secondary findings have been a major part of the discussion of genomic medicine research and clinical applications. For pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing, secondary findings arise due to the pleiotropic effects of pharmacogenes, often related to their endogenous functions. Unlike the guidelines that have been developed for whole exome or genome sequencing applications for management of secondary findings (though slightly different from PGx testing in that these refer to detection of variants in multiple genes, some with clinical significance and actionability), no corresponding guidelines have been developed for PGx clinical laboratories. Nonetheless, patient and provider education will remain key components of any PGx testing program to minimize adverse responses related to secondary findings.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Front Genet

DOI

ISSN

1664-8021

Publication Date

2021

Volume

12

Start / End Page

741395

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • 3105 Genetics
  • 1801 Law
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 0604 Genetics
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Haga, S. B. (2021). Revisiting Secondary Information Related to Pharmacogenetic Testing. Front Genet, 12, 741395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.741395
Haga, Susanne B. “Revisiting Secondary Information Related to Pharmacogenetic Testing.Front Genet 12 (2021): 741395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.741395.
Haga, Susanne B. “Revisiting Secondary Information Related to Pharmacogenetic Testing.Front Genet, vol. 12, 2021, p. 741395. Pubmed, doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.741395.

Published In

Front Genet

DOI

ISSN

1664-8021

Publication Date

2021

Volume

12

Start / End Page

741395

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • 3105 Genetics
  • 1801 Law
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 0604 Genetics