Theory Without Theories: Well-Being, Ethics, and Medicine.
Medical ethics would be better if people were taught to think more clearly about well-being or (what I take to be the same thing) the concept of what is good for a person. Yet for a variety of reasons, bioethicists have generally paid little attention to this concept. Here, I argue, first, that focusing on general theories of welfare is not useful for practical medical ethics. I argue, second, for what I call the "theory-without-theories approach" to welfare in practical contexts. The first element of this approach is a focus on examining important and relatively uncontroversial constituents of welfare as opposed to general theories. The second key element is a framework for thinking about choice in relation to welfare, a framework I refer to as "the mild objectivity framework." I conclude with illustrations of the way in which the "theory without theories approach" can improve thinking in medicine.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
DOI
EISSN
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Related Subject Headings
- Personal Autonomy
- Moral Obligations
- Humans
- Ethics, Medical
- Ethical Theory
- Beneficence
- Applied Ethics
- 5003 Philosophy
- 5002 History and philosophy of specific fields
- 5001 Applied ethics
Citation
Published In
DOI
EISSN
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Related Subject Headings
- Personal Autonomy
- Moral Obligations
- Humans
- Ethics, Medical
- Ethical Theory
- Beneficence
- Applied Ethics
- 5003 Philosophy
- 5002 History and philosophy of specific fields
- 5001 Applied ethics