Battling to a Draw: Defense Expert Rebuttal Can Neutralize Prosecution Fingerprint Evidence
Publication
, Journal Article
Garrett, BL; Mitchell, G
Published in: Applied Cognitive Psychology
2021
Duke Scholars
Published In
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publication Date
2021
Volume
35
Issue
4
Start / End Page
976 / 987
Related Subject Headings
- Experimental Psychology
- 5204 Cognitive and computational psychology
- 5201 Applied and developmental psychology
- 3904 Specialist studies in education
- 1702 Cognitive Sciences
- 1701 Psychology
- 1505 Marketing
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Garrett, B. L., & Mitchell, G. (2021). Battling to a Draw: Defense Expert Rebuttal Can Neutralize Prosecution Fingerprint Evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(4), 976–987.
Garrett, Brandon L., and Gregory Mitchell. “Battling to a Draw: Defense Expert Rebuttal Can Neutralize Prosecution Fingerprint Evidence.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 35, no. 4 (2021): 976–87.
Garrett BL, Mitchell G. Battling to a Draw: Defense Expert Rebuttal Can Neutralize Prosecution Fingerprint Evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2021;35(4):976–87.
Garrett, Brandon L., and Gregory Mitchell. “Battling to a Draw: Defense Expert Rebuttal Can Neutralize Prosecution Fingerprint Evidence.” Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 35, no. 4, 2021, pp. 976–87.
Garrett BL, Mitchell G. Battling to a Draw: Defense Expert Rebuttal Can Neutralize Prosecution Fingerprint Evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2021;35(4):976–987.
Published In
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publication Date
2021
Volume
35
Issue
4
Start / End Page
976 / 987
Related Subject Headings
- Experimental Psychology
- 5204 Cognitive and computational psychology
- 5201 Applied and developmental psychology
- 3904 Specialist studies in education
- 1702 Cognitive Sciences
- 1701 Psychology
- 1505 Marketing