An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited
Publication
, Chapter
Flanagan, O; Jackson, K
January 1, 2016
In 1958, G. E. M. Anscombe wrote, “It is not profitable for us at present to do moral philosophy; that should be laid aside at any rate until we have an adequate philosophy of psychology, in which we are conspicuously lacking” (186). Anscombe hinted (and she and many others pursued the hint) that the Aristotelian tradition was the best place to look for a richer and less shadowy conception of moral agency than either utilitarianism or Kantianism had provided.
Duke Scholars
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Flanagan, O., & Jackson, K. (2016). Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited. In An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 69–84). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203760192-13
Flanagan, O., and K. Jackson. “Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited.” In An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 69–84, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203760192-13.
Flanagan O, Jackson K. Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited. In: An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2016. p. 69–84.
Flanagan, O., and K. Jackson. “Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited.” An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2016, pp. 69–84. Scopus, doi:10.4324/9780203760192-13.
Flanagan O, Jackson K. Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited. An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2016. p. 69–84.