Multiple destination trip bias in recreation benefit estimation.
Publication
, Journal Article
Haspel, AE; Johnson, FR
Published in: Land Economics
January 1, 1982
One widely accepted technique for estimating the willingness to pay for a recreation site in CBA is the travel cost method. This study examines the consequences of multiple destination trips on travel cost estimates of benefits. It also suggests a means of correcting the bias that arises under such circumstances and obtains nearly identical value estimates from the travel cost method and from a direct question on willingness-to-pay. -R.K.Turner
Duke Scholars
Published In
Land Economics
DOI
ISSN
0023-7639
Publication Date
January 1, 1982
Volume
58
Issue
3
Start / End Page
364 / 372
Related Subject Headings
- Agricultural Economics & Policy
- 1402 Applied Economics
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Haspel, A. E., & Johnson, F. R. (1982). Multiple destination trip bias in recreation benefit estimation. Land Economics, 58(3), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.2307/3145943
Haspel, A. E., and F. R. Johnson. “Multiple destination trip bias in recreation benefit estimation.” Land Economics 58, no. 3 (January 1, 1982): 364–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/3145943.
Haspel AE, Johnson FR. Multiple destination trip bias in recreation benefit estimation. Land Economics. 1982 Jan 1;58(3):364–72.
Haspel, A. E., and F. R. Johnson. “Multiple destination trip bias in recreation benefit estimation.” Land Economics, vol. 58, no. 3, Jan. 1982, pp. 364–72. Scopus, doi:10.2307/3145943.
Haspel AE, Johnson FR. Multiple destination trip bias in recreation benefit estimation. Land Economics. 1982 Jan 1;58(3):364–372.
Published In
Land Economics
DOI
ISSN
0023-7639
Publication Date
January 1, 1982
Volume
58
Issue
3
Start / End Page
364 / 372
Related Subject Headings
- Agricultural Economics & Policy
- 1402 Applied Economics