Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Omission of Radiation in Conservative Treatment for Breast Cancer: Opportunity for De-escalation of Care.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hong, MJ; Lum, SS; Dupont, E; Howard-McNatt, M; Chiba, A; Levine, EA; Gass, JS; Gallagher, K; Fenton, A; Murray, M; Solomon, NL; Ollila, DW ...
Published in: J Surg Res
November 2022

INTRODUCTION: De-escalation of breast cancer treatment aims to reduce patient and financial toxicity without compromising outcomes. Level I evidence and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines support omission of adjuvant radiation in patients aged >70 y with hormone-sensitive, pT1N0M0 invasive breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. We evaluated radiation use in patients eligible for guideline concordant omission of radiation. METHODS: Subgroup analysis of patients eligible for radiation omission from two pooled randomized controlled trials, which included stage 0-III breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery, was performed to evaluate factors associated with radiation use. RESULTS: Of 631 patients, 47 (7.4%) met radiation omission criteria and were treated by 14 surgeons at eight institutions. The mean age was 75.3 (standard deviation + 4.4) y. Majority of patients identified as White (n = 46; 97.9%) and non-Hispanic (n = 44; 93.6%). The mean tumor size was 1.0 cm; 37 patients (88.1%) had ductal, 4 patients (9.5%) had lobular, and 17 patients (40.5%) had low-grade disease. Among patients eligible for radiation omission, 34 (72.3%) patients received adjuvant radiation. Those who received radiation were significantly younger than those who did not (74 y, interquartile range = 4 y, versus 78 y, interquartile range = 11 y, P = 0.03). There was no difference in radiation use based on size (P = 0.4), histology (P = 0.5), grade (P = 0.7), race (P = 1), ethnicity (P = 0.6), institution (P = 0.1), gender of the surgeon (P = 0.7), or surgeon (P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 10% of patients undergoing breast conservation met criteria for radiation omission. Nearly three-quarters received radiation therapy with younger age being a driver of radiation use, suggesting ample opportunity for de-escalation, particularly among younger eligible patients.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Surg Res

DOI

EISSN

1095-8673

Publication Date

November 2022

Volume

279

Start / End Page

393 / 397

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Surgery
  • Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Mastectomy, Segmental
  • Humans
  • Hormones
  • Female
  • Conservative Treatment
  • Carcinoma in Situ
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Aged
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hong, M. J., Lum, S. S., Dupont, E., Howard-McNatt, M., Chiba, A., Levine, E. A., … SHAVE2 Investigators. (2022). Omission of Radiation in Conservative Treatment for Breast Cancer: Opportunity for De-escalation of Care. J Surg Res, 279, 393–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.036
Journal cover image

Published In

J Surg Res

DOI

EISSN

1095-8673

Publication Date

November 2022

Volume

279

Start / End Page

393 / 397

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Surgery
  • Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Mastectomy, Segmental
  • Humans
  • Hormones
  • Female
  • Conservative Treatment
  • Carcinoma in Situ
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Aged