Skip to main content

Current Concepts in Cranial Reconstruction: Review of Alloplastic Materials.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Johnston, DT; Lohmeier, SJ; Langdell, HC; Pyfer, BJ; Komisarow, J; Powers, DB; Erdmann, D
Published in: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
August 2022

UNLABELLED: Cranioplasty for acquired cranial defects can be complex and challenging. Benefits include improved cosmesis, protection of intracranial structures, and restoration of neurocognitive function. These defects can be reconstructed with preserved craniectomy bone flaps, split autografts, or alloplastic materials. When alloplastic cranioplasty is planned, the material should be carefully selected. There is confusion on which material should be used in certain scenarios, particularly in composite defects. METHODS: The PubMed database was used to conduct a nonsystematic review of literature related to these materials and the following factors: time required in preoperative planning and fabrication, intraoperative time, feasibility of intraoperative modification, fixation method (direct or indirect), implant cost, overall complication rate, and surgical revision rates. RESULTS: Surgical revision rates for alloplastic materials range from 10% to 23%. Retention of titanium mesh at 4 years is 85% in composite reconstruction with free fasciocutaneous and free myocutaneous flaps. In composite reconstruction with locoregional and free muscle flaps, the retention of titanium mesh at 4 years is 47%. The retention of nontitanium and nonpreserved autogenous reconstruction is 72% and 82%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Alloplastic materials should be considered for reconstruction of large (>100 cm2) cranial defects, especially for adult patients younger than 30 years, and all patients with bone flaps that are fragmented or have been cryopreserved for an extended period. Preformed titanium mesh provides a favorable primary reconstructive option when a staged reconstruction is not possible or indicated but should be avoided in composite defects reconstructed with locoregional scalp and free muscle flaps.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open

DOI

ISSN

2169-7574

Publication Date

August 2022

Volume

10

Issue

8

Start / End Page

e4466

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • 3213 Paediatrics
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Johnston, D. T., Lohmeier, S. J., Langdell, H. C., Pyfer, B. J., Komisarow, J., Powers, D. B., & Erdmann, D. (2022). Current Concepts in Cranial Reconstruction: Review of Alloplastic Materials. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 10(8), e4466. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004466
Johnston, Darin T., Steven J. Lohmeier, Hannah C. Langdell, Bryan J. Pyfer, Jordan Komisarow, David B. Powers, and Detlev Erdmann. “Current Concepts in Cranial Reconstruction: Review of Alloplastic Materials.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 10, no. 8 (August 2022): e4466. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004466.
Johnston DT, Lohmeier SJ, Langdell HC, Pyfer BJ, Komisarow J, Powers DB, et al. Current Concepts in Cranial Reconstruction: Review of Alloplastic Materials. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Aug;10(8):e4466.
Johnston, Darin T., et al. “Current Concepts in Cranial Reconstruction: Review of Alloplastic Materials.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, vol. 10, no. 8, Aug. 2022, p. e4466. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000004466.
Johnston DT, Lohmeier SJ, Langdell HC, Pyfer BJ, Komisarow J, Powers DB, Erdmann D. Current Concepts in Cranial Reconstruction: Review of Alloplastic Materials. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Aug;10(8):e4466.

Published In

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open

DOI

ISSN

2169-7574

Publication Date

August 2022

Volume

10

Issue

8

Start / End Page

e4466

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • 3213 Paediatrics
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 3202 Clinical sciences