Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Clinical Implications of Second and Third Trimester Surveillance Ultrasounds of Growth-Restricted Fetuses.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Craig, AM; Kaur, K; Heerboth, SA; Chen, H; Lauderdale, CJ; Shannon, C; Zuckerwise, LC
Published in: AJP Rep
October 2021

Objective  We sought to investigate the positive predictive value of ultrasound-diagnosed fetal growth restriction (FGR) for estimating small for gestational age (SGA) at birth. Secondary objectives were to describe clinical interventions performed as a result of FGR diagnosis. Study Design  This was a retrospective cohort of pregnancies diagnosed with FGR over 3 years at a single institution. Maternal demographics, antenatal and delivery data, and neonatal data were collected. Descriptive statistics and linear regression were conducted. Results  We included 406 pregnancies with diagnosis of FGR in second or third trimester. Median birth weight percentile was 17 (interquartile range: 5-50) and only 35.0% of these fetuses were SGA at birth. The positive predictive value of a final growth ultrasound below the 10th percentile for SGA at birth was 56.9%. Patients averaged eight additional growth ultrasounds following FGR diagnosis. One hundred and fourteen (28.1%) received antenatal steroids prior to delivery, and 100% of those delivered after more than 7 days following administration. There were 6 fetal deaths and 14 neonatal deaths. Conclusion  In the majority of cases, pregnancies diagnosed with FGR during screening ultrasounds resulted in normally grown neonates and term deliveries. These patients may be receiving unnecessary ultrasounds and premature courses of corticosteroids.

Duke Scholars

Published In

AJP Rep

DOI

ISSN

2157-6998

Publication Date

October 2021

Volume

11

Issue

4

Start / End Page

e132 / e136

Location

United States
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Craig, A. M., Kaur, K., Heerboth, S. A., Chen, H., Lauderdale, C. J., Shannon, C., & Zuckerwise, L. C. (2021). Clinical Implications of Second and Third Trimester Surveillance Ultrasounds of Growth-Restricted Fetuses. AJP Rep, 11(4), e132–e136. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740170
Craig, Amanda M., Karampreet Kaur, Sarah A. Heerboth, Heidi Chen, Chelsea J. Lauderdale, Chevis Shannon, and Lisa C. Zuckerwise. “Clinical Implications of Second and Third Trimester Surveillance Ultrasounds of Growth-Restricted Fetuses.AJP Rep 11, no. 4 (October 2021): e132–36. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740170.
Craig AM, Kaur K, Heerboth SA, Chen H, Lauderdale CJ, Shannon C, et al. Clinical Implications of Second and Third Trimester Surveillance Ultrasounds of Growth-Restricted Fetuses. AJP Rep. 2021 Oct;11(4):e132–6.
Craig, Amanda M., et al. “Clinical Implications of Second and Third Trimester Surveillance Ultrasounds of Growth-Restricted Fetuses.AJP Rep, vol. 11, no. 4, Oct. 2021, pp. e132–36. Pubmed, doi:10.1055/s-0041-1740170.
Craig AM, Kaur K, Heerboth SA, Chen H, Lauderdale CJ, Shannon C, Zuckerwise LC. Clinical Implications of Second and Third Trimester Surveillance Ultrasounds of Growth-Restricted Fetuses. AJP Rep. 2021 Oct;11(4):e132–e136.
Journal cover image

Published In

AJP Rep

DOI

ISSN

2157-6998

Publication Date

October 2021

Volume

11

Issue

4

Start / End Page

e132 / e136

Location

United States