
Indirect treatment comparison of oral versus injectable azacitidine as maintenance therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.
Aim: Evaluate the relative efficacy of oral versus injectable azacitidine (AZA) maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after complete remission. Materials & methods: Systematic literature review identified QUAZAR AML-001, HOVON 97 AML, UK NCRI AML16 and QoLESS-AZA-AMLE (sensitivity analysis) trials. Network meta-analysis and matching-adjusted indirect comparisons assessed survival outcomes. Results: In the network meta-analysis, combining the HOVON 97 and UK NCRI trials, oral AZA (QUAZAR) was associated with significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus injectable AZA (hazard ratio: 0.744; 95% credible interval: 0.557-0.998). After matching-adjusted indirect comparisons, to address differences in patient characteristics across trials, OS improvements were maintained with oral versus injectable AZA (hazard ratio: 0.753; credible interval: 0.563-0.998). Conclusion: In AML, maintenance therapy with oral AZA was associated with improved OS versus injectable AZA.
Duke Scholars
Published In
DOI
EISSN
Publication Date
Location
Related Subject Headings
- Oncology & Carcinogenesis
- 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Citation

Published In
DOI
EISSN
Publication Date
Location
Related Subject Headings
- Oncology & Carcinogenesis
- 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis