Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Social construction and indeterminacy

Publication ,  Journal Article
Richardson, K
Published in: Analytic Philosophy
March 1, 2024

An increasing number of philosophers argue that indeterminacy is metaphysical (or worldly) in the sense that indeterminacy has its source in the world itself (rather than how the world is represented or known). The standard arguments for metaphysical indeterminacy are centered around the sorites paradox. In this essay, I present a novel argument for metaphysical indeterminacy. I argue that metaphysical indeterminacy follows from the existence of constitutive social construction; there is indeterminacy in the social world because there is indeterminacy in how the social world is constructed.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Analytic Philosophy

DOI

EISSN

2153-960X

ISSN

2153-9596

Publication Date

March 1, 2024

Volume

65

Issue

1

Start / End Page

37 / 52

Related Subject Headings

  • 5003 Philosophy
  • 2203 Philosophy
  • 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Richardson, K. (2024). Social construction and indeterminacy. Analytic Philosophy, 65(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12299
Richardson, K. “Social construction and indeterminacy.” Analytic Philosophy 65, no. 1 (March 1, 2024): 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12299.
Richardson K. Social construction and indeterminacy. Analytic Philosophy. 2024 Mar 1;65(1):37–52.
Richardson, K. “Social construction and indeterminacy.” Analytic Philosophy, vol. 65, no. 1, Mar. 2024, pp. 37–52. Scopus, doi:10.1111/phib.12299.
Richardson K. Social construction and indeterminacy. Analytic Philosophy. 2024 Mar 1;65(1):37–52.
Journal cover image

Published In

Analytic Philosophy

DOI

EISSN

2153-960X

ISSN

2153-9596

Publication Date

March 1, 2024

Volume

65

Issue

1

Start / End Page

37 / 52

Related Subject Headings

  • 5003 Philosophy
  • 2203 Philosophy
  • 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields