Social construction and indeterminacy
Publication
, Journal Article
Richardson, K
Published in: Analytic Philosophy
March 1, 2024
An increasing number of philosophers argue that indeterminacy is metaphysical (or worldly) in the sense that indeterminacy has its source in the world itself (rather than how the world is represented or known). The standard arguments for metaphysical indeterminacy are centered around the sorites paradox. In this essay, I present a novel argument for metaphysical indeterminacy. I argue that metaphysical indeterminacy follows from the existence of constitutive social construction; there is indeterminacy in the social world because there is indeterminacy in how the social world is constructed.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Analytic Philosophy
DOI
EISSN
2153-960X
ISSN
2153-9596
Publication Date
March 1, 2024
Volume
65
Issue
1
Start / End Page
37 / 52
Related Subject Headings
- 5003 Philosophy
- 2203 Philosophy
- 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Richardson, K. (2024). Social construction and indeterminacy. Analytic Philosophy, 65(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12299
Richardson, K. “Social construction and indeterminacy.” Analytic Philosophy 65, no. 1 (March 1, 2024): 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12299.
Richardson K. Social construction and indeterminacy. Analytic Philosophy. 2024 Mar 1;65(1):37–52.
Richardson, K. “Social construction and indeterminacy.” Analytic Philosophy, vol. 65, no. 1, Mar. 2024, pp. 37–52. Scopus, doi:10.1111/phib.12299.
Richardson K. Social construction and indeterminacy. Analytic Philosophy. 2024 Mar 1;65(1):37–52.
Published In
Analytic Philosophy
DOI
EISSN
2153-960X
ISSN
2153-9596
Publication Date
March 1, 2024
Volume
65
Issue
1
Start / End Page
37 / 52
Related Subject Headings
- 5003 Philosophy
- 2203 Philosophy
- 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields