Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Verification of prognostic expression biomarkers is improved by examining enriched leukemic blasts rather than mononuclear cells from acute myeloid leukemia patients.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Pogosova-Agadjanyan, EL; Hua, X; Othus, M; Appelbaum, FR; Chauncey, TR; Erba, HP; Fitzgibbon, MP; Jenkins, IC; Fang, M; Lee, SC; Moseley, A ...
Published in: Biomark Res
March 16, 2023

BACKGROUND: Studies have not systematically compared the ability to verify performance of prognostic transcripts in paired bulk mononuclear cells versus viable CD34-expressing leukemic blasts from patients with acute myeloid leukemia. We hypothesized that examining the homogenous leukemic blasts will yield different biological information and may improve prognostic performance of expression biomarkers. METHODS: To assess the impact of cellular heterogeneity on expression biomarkers in acute myeloid leukemia, we systematically examined paired mononuclear cells and viable CD34-expressing leukemic blasts from SWOG diagnostic specimens. After enrichment, patients were assigned into discovery and validation cohorts based on availability of extracted RNA. Analyses of RNA sequencing data examined how enrichment impacted differentially expressed genes associated with pre-analytic variables, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Blast enrichment yielded significantly different expression profiles and biological pathways associated with clinical characteristics (e.g., cytogenetics). Although numerous differentially expressed genes were associated with clinical outcomes, most lost their prognostic significance in the mononuclear cells and blasts after adjusting for age and ELN risk, with only 11 genes remaining significant for overall survival in both cell populations (CEP70, COMMD7, DNMT3B, ECE1, LNX2, NEGR1, PIK3C2B, SEMA4D, SMAD2, TAF8, ZNF444). To examine the impact of enrichment on biomarker verification, these 11 candidate biomarkers were examined by quantitative RT/PCR in the validation cohort. After adjusting for ELN risk and age, expression of 4 genes (CEP70, DNMT3B, ECE1, and PIK3CB) remained significantly associated with overall survival in the blasts, while none met statistical significance in mononuclear cells. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into biological information gained/lost by examining viable CD34-expressing leukemic blasts versus mononuclear cells from the same patient and shows an improved verification rate for expression biomarkers in blasts.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Biomark Res

DOI

ISSN

2050-7771

Publication Date

March 16, 2023

Volume

11

Issue

1

Start / End Page

31

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 3206 Medical biotechnology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E. L., Hua, X., Othus, M., Appelbaum, F. R., Chauncey, T. R., Erba, H. P., … Stirewalt, D. L. (2023). Verification of prognostic expression biomarkers is improved by examining enriched leukemic blasts rather than mononuclear cells from acute myeloid leukemia patients. Biomark Res, 11(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-023-00461-0
Pogosova-Agadjanyan, Era L., Xing Hua, Megan Othus, Frederick R. Appelbaum, Thomas R. Chauncey, Harry P. Erba, Matthew P. Fitzgibbon, et al. “Verification of prognostic expression biomarkers is improved by examining enriched leukemic blasts rather than mononuclear cells from acute myeloid leukemia patients.Biomark Res 11, no. 1 (March 16, 2023): 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-023-00461-0.
Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, Hua X, Othus M, Appelbaum FR, Chauncey TR, Erba HP, et al. Verification of prognostic expression biomarkers is improved by examining enriched leukemic blasts rather than mononuclear cells from acute myeloid leukemia patients. Biomark Res. 2023 Mar 16;11(1):31.
Pogosova-Agadjanyan, Era L., et al. “Verification of prognostic expression biomarkers is improved by examining enriched leukemic blasts rather than mononuclear cells from acute myeloid leukemia patients.Biomark Res, vol. 11, no. 1, Mar. 2023, p. 31. Pubmed, doi:10.1186/s40364-023-00461-0.
Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, Hua X, Othus M, Appelbaum FR, Chauncey TR, Erba HP, Fitzgibbon MP, Jenkins IC, Fang M, Lee SC, Moseley A, Naru J, Radich JP, Smith JL, Willborg BE, Willman CL, Wu F, Meshinchi S, Stirewalt DL. Verification of prognostic expression biomarkers is improved by examining enriched leukemic blasts rather than mononuclear cells from acute myeloid leukemia patients. Biomark Res. 2023 Mar 16;11(1):31.
Journal cover image

Published In

Biomark Res

DOI

ISSN

2050-7771

Publication Date

March 16, 2023

Volume

11

Issue

1

Start / End Page

31

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 3206 Medical biotechnology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences