Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparison of an all-inside suture technique with traditional pull-out suture and suture anchor repair techniques for flexor digitorum profundus attachment to bone.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Chu, JY; Chen, T; Awad, HA; Elfar, J; Hammert, WC
Published in: J Hand Surg Am
June 2013

PURPOSE: One goal in repairing zone 1 flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) injuries is to create a tendon-bone construct strong enough to allow early rehabilitation while minimizing morbidity. This study compares an all-inside suture repair technique biomechanically with pull-out suture and double-suture anchor repairs. METHODS: Repairs were performed on 30 cadaver fingers. In all-inside suture repairs (n = 8), the FDP tendon was attached to bone with two 3-0 Ethibond sutures and tied over the dorsal aspect of distal phalanx. Pull-out suture repairs (n = 8) were performed with 2-0 Prolene suture and tied over a dorsal button. There were 2 suture anchor repair groups: Arthrex Micro Corkscrew anchors preloaded with 2-0 FiberWire suture (n = 7) and Depuy Micro Mitek anchors preloaded with 3-0 Orthocord suture (n = 7). Repair constructs were tested using a servohydraulic materials testing system and loaded until the repair lost 75% of its strength. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in tensile stiffness, ultimate load, or work to failure between the repairs. Failure mode was suture stretch and gap formation greater than 2 mm at the repair site for all pull-out suture repairs and for 7 of 8 all-inside suture repairs. Two of the Arthrex Micro Corkscrew repairs and 5 of the Depuy Micro Mitek repairs failed by anchor pull-out. CONCLUSIONS: This cadaveric biomechanical study showed no difference in tensile stiffness, ultimate load, and work to failures between an all-inside suture repair technique for zone 1 FDP repairs and previously described pull-out suture and suture anchor repair techniques. The all-inside suture technique also has the advantages of avoiding an external button and the cost of anchors. Therefore, it should be considered as an alternative to other techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study introduces a new FDP reattachment technique that avoids some of the shortcomings of current techniques.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Hand Surg Am

DOI

EISSN

1531-6564

Publication Date

June 2013

Volume

38

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1084 / 1090

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tensile Strength
  • Tendon Injuries
  • Sutures
  • Suture Techniques
  • Suture Anchors
  • Polyethylene Terephthalates
  • Orthopedics
  • Humans
  • Finger Injuries
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Chu, J. Y., Chen, T., Awad, H. A., Elfar, J., & Hammert, W. C. (2013). Comparison of an all-inside suture technique with traditional pull-out suture and suture anchor repair techniques for flexor digitorum profundus attachment to bone. J Hand Surg Am, 38(6), 1084–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.015
Chu, Jennifer Y., Tony Chen, Hani A. Awad, John Elfar, and Warren C. Hammert. “Comparison of an all-inside suture technique with traditional pull-out suture and suture anchor repair techniques for flexor digitorum profundus attachment to bone.J Hand Surg Am 38, no. 6 (June 2013): 1084–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.015.
Chu, Jennifer Y., et al. “Comparison of an all-inside suture technique with traditional pull-out suture and suture anchor repair techniques for flexor digitorum profundus attachment to bone.J Hand Surg Am, vol. 38, no. 6, June 2013, pp. 1084–90. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.015.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Hand Surg Am

DOI

EISSN

1531-6564

Publication Date

June 2013

Volume

38

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1084 / 1090

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tensile Strength
  • Tendon Injuries
  • Sutures
  • Suture Techniques
  • Suture Anchors
  • Polyethylene Terephthalates
  • Orthopedics
  • Humans
  • Finger Injuries
  • Biomechanical Phenomena